> -Original Message-
> From: Rickard Öberg [mailto:[EMAIL PROTECTED]
>
> Well, that's a damn good question :-) One could argue that an
> invocation
> should be created immediately upon creation of actionproxy, and when
> it's invoked then the reference to it is "lost" so that any
> sub
Jason Carreira wrote:
I started looking at doing this and ran into some snags. For instance,
if the code calling the Proxy wants to get at the Action, how does it do
that? The ActionInvocation won't even have been created yet, if the
Proxy hasn't been executed, and will the Action make sense in a c
Going back through these points
> -Original Message-
> From: Rickard [mailto:[EMAIL PROTECTED]
> Sent: Friday, February 28, 2003 8:17 AM
> To: WebWork
> Subject: [OS-webwork] Configuration questions
>
>
> Hi!
>
> I'm looking through the Configuration stuff in XWork, and have the
>
> -Original Message-
> From: Rickard Öberg [mailto:[EMAIL PROTECTED]
>
> Ok, well I guess this argument is the same as parameterized
> commands. I
> have a couple of interceptors in my own AOP application that
> are indeed
> parameterized, so at least in that context there's a need, a
Jason Carreira wrote:
* This method in ConfigurationManager is wrong:
Interceptor getInterceptor(String clazz)
It assumes that there is only one instance of each
interceptor class.
This does not account for the case where one instance is used
with many
names (compare with servlets), and confi
> -Original Message-
> From: Rickard [mailto:[EMAIL PROTECTED]
> Sent: Friday, February 28, 2003 8:17 AM
> To: WebWork
> Subject: [OS-webwork] Configuration questions
>
>
> Hi!
>
> I'm looking through the Configuration stuff in XWork, and have the
> following comments/questions:
> * Wh
