RE: [OS-webwork] Validation Framework details

2003-09-29 Thread Fred Lamuette
In this case, you have to throw an exception for a user-defined converter? -Message d'origine- De : [EMAIL PROTECTED] [mailto:[EMAIL PROTECTED] la part de Jason Carreira Envoye : lundi 29 septembre 2003 20:32 A : [EMAIL PROTECTED] Objet : RE: [OS-webwork] Validation Framework de

RE: [OS-webwork] Validation Framework details

2003-09-29 Thread Fred Lamuette
It's really a problem, i cant understand anybody else is requesting that !! -Message d'origine- De : [EMAIL PROTECTED] [mailto:[EMAIL PROTECTED] la part de Adam Fleming Envoye : lundi 29 septembre 2003 18:49 A : [EMAIL PROTECTED] Objet : Re: [OS-webwork] Validation Framework de

RE: [OS-webwork] Validation Framework details

2003-09-29 Thread Jason Carreira
tember 29, 2003 12:49 PM > To: [EMAIL PROTECTED] > Subject: Re: [OS-webwork] Validation Framework details > > > Hi, > > This is a problem I am having trouble with too (as I am sure many > others). How can you get the original input if the field you are > validating is

RE: [OS-webwork] Validation Framework details

2003-09-29 Thread Jason Carreira
ginal Message- > From: Fred Lamuette [mailto:[EMAIL PROTECTED] > Sent: Saturday, September 27, 2003 2:20 PM > To: [EMAIL PROTECTED] > Subject: RE: [OS-webwork] Validation Framework details > > > Ok, you say "Type conversion handle this". But when will be >

Re: [OS-webwork] Validation Framework details

2003-09-29 Thread Adam Fleming
to:[EMAIL PROTECTED] la part de Jason Carreira Envoye : samedi 27 septembre 2003 14:19 A : [EMAIL PROTECTED] Objet : RE: [OS-webwork] Validation Framework details You thought what I said was overcomplicated? This sounds WAY too complicated... Type conversion handles this... -Original Message--

RE: [OS-webwork] Validation Framework details

2003-09-27 Thread Fred Lamuette
Jason Carreira Envoye : samedi 27 septembre 2003 14:19 A : [EMAIL PROTECTED] Objet : RE: [OS-webwork] Validation Framework details You thought what I said was overcomplicated? This sounds WAY too complicated... Type conversion handles this... > -Original Message- > From: Fred La

RE: [OS-webwork] Validation Framework details

2003-09-27 Thread Jason Carreira
ne- > De : [EMAIL PROTECTED] > [mailto:[EMAIL PROTECTED] > la part de Jason Carreira Envoye : vendredi 26 septembre 2003 > 16:54 A : [EMAIL PROTECTED] > Objet : RE: [OS-webwork] Validation Framework details > > > > -Original Message- > > From:

RE: [OS-webwork] Validation Framework details

2003-09-26 Thread Fred Lamuette
: [EMAIL PROTECTED] Objet : RE: [OS-webwork] Validation Framework details > -Original Message- > From: Fred Lamuette [mailto:[EMAIL PROTECTED] > > My question : how can i do to see the message "Your text "Foo > Bar" could not be parsed as a date", w

RE: [OS-webwork] Validation Framework details

2003-09-26 Thread Jason Carreira
> -Original Message- > From: Fred Lamuette [mailto:[EMAIL PROTECTED] > > My question : how can i do to see the message "Your text "Foo > Bar" could not be parsed as a date", what can i do in my > dateconverter to add a FieldError > > Cheers. > Richard. Short answer: You can't Lon

RE: [OS-webwork] Validation Framework details

2003-09-25 Thread Fred Lamuette
Message d'origine- De : [EMAIL PROTECTED] [mailto:[EMAIL PROTECTED] la part de Jason Carreira Envoye : jeudi 25 septembre 2003 20:40 A : [EMAIL PROTECTED] Objet : RE: [OS-webwork] Validation Framework details > -Original Message----- > From: Fred Lamuette [mailto:[EMAIL PROTE

RE: [OS-webwork] Validation Framework details

2003-09-25 Thread Jason Carreira
> -Original Message- > From: Fred Lamuette [mailto:[EMAIL PROTECTED] > Sent: Thursday, September 25, 2003 1:58 PM > To: [EMAIL PROTECTED] > Subject: RE: [OS-webwork] Validation Framework details > > > You have a model class in your action to populate, one

RE: [OS-webwork] Validation Framework details

2003-09-25 Thread Fred Lamuette
A : [EMAIL PROTECTED] Objet : RE: [OS-webwork] Validation Framework details > -Original Message- > From: Fred Lamuette [mailto:[EMAIL PROTECTED] > Sent: Thursday, September 25, 2003 5:23 AM > To: [EMAIL PROTECTED] > Subject: RE: [OS-webwork] Validation Framework details

RE: [OS-webwork] Validation Framework details

2003-09-25 Thread Jason Carreira
> -Original Message- > From: Fred Lamuette [mailto:[EMAIL PROTECTED] > Sent: Thursday, September 25, 2003 5:23 AM > To: [EMAIL PROTECTED] > Subject: RE: [OS-webwork] Validation Framework details > > > That was my idea in one of my previous post, but finally

RE: [OS-webwork] Validation Framework details

2003-09-25 Thread Fred Lamuette
PROTECTED] la part de Jason Carreira Envoye : jeudi 25 septembre 2003 04:28 A : [EMAIL PROTECTED] Objet : RE: [OS-webwork] Validation Framework details > -Original Message- > From: Tracy Snell [mailto:[EMAIL PROTECTED] > Sent: Wednesday, September 24, 2003 10:17 PM > To: [

RE: [OS-webwork] Validation Framework details

2003-09-24 Thread Jason Carreira
> -Original Message- > From: Tracy Snell [mailto:[EMAIL PROTECTED] > Sent: Wednesday, September 24, 2003 10:17 PM > To: [EMAIL PROTECTED] > Subject: Re: [OS-webwork] Validation Framework details > > > On 9/24/03 8:45 PM, "Jason Carreira" > <[

Re: [OS-webwork] Validation Framework details

2003-09-24 Thread Tracy Snell
On 9/24/03 8:45 PM, "Jason Carreira" <[EMAIL PROTECTED]> wrote: > The type conversion framework will handle this part... It sounds like we > (Patrick and I) need to get together on making these work together > better and make it so the type conversion can provide good messages. Wouldn't having t

RE: [OS-webwork] Validation Framework details

2003-09-24 Thread Jason Carreira
The type conversion framework will handle this part... It sounds like we (Patrick and I) need to get together on making these work together better and make it so the type conversion can provide good messages. > -Original Message- > From: Adam Fleming [mailto:[EMAIL PROTECTED] > Sent: Wedn