]
[EMAIL PROTECTED]cc:
ceforge.net Subject: RE:
[OS-webwork] Validation Framework doubt
I got it, but haven't had time to look yet. I'll take a look tonight.
-Original Message-
From: Samuel Mota [mailto:[EMAIL PROTECTED]
Sent: Tuesday, September 02, 2003 10:23 AM
To: [EMAIL PROTECTED]
Subject: RE: [OS-webwork] Validation Framework doubt
Jason, guys ...
I've
Hi,
Continuing my doubts about this topic ...
I'm debugging my form to see WHY even if I post some content at my validated fields
(using the XWork
validation framework and the interceptor) I get error messages.
The field types are corret at the validation.xml file (ranges and so on) ... names
and the param type in the setter are the
same, or the Java introspector code can get confused.
-Original Message-
From: Samuel Mota [mailto:[EMAIL PROTECTED]
Sent: Monday, September 01, 2003 9:08 AM
To: [EMAIL PROTECTED]
Subject: RE: [OS-webwork] Validation Framework doubt
Hi
[mailto:[EMAIL PROTECTED]
Sent: Thursday, August 28, 2003 9:10 AM
To: [EMAIL PROTECTED]
Subject: RE: [OS-webwork] Validation Framework doubt
Hi,
map of fieldErrors. It WILL NOT stop execution just because
you have an
error. You can apply the DefaultWorkflowInterceptor after
Mota [mailto:[EMAIL PROTECTED]
Sent: Thursday, August 28, 2003 9:10 AM
To: [EMAIL PROTECTED]
Subject: RE: [OS-webwork] Validation Framework doubt
Hi,
map of fieldErrors. It WILL NOT stop execution just because
you have an
error. You can apply the DefaultWorkflowInterceptor after
on
doing validations using the validation framework and anything else would
be done in the execute() method. What do others think?
-Original Message-
From: Pat Lightbody [mailto:[EMAIL PROTECTED]
Sent: Thursday, August 28, 2003 11:24 AM
To: [EMAIL PROTECTED]
Subject: Re: [OS-webwork
]
Subject: Re: [OS-webwork] Validation Framework doubt
Jason,
One request -- when you move the logic in to an
interceptor... can you use a Lifecycle interface rather than
reflection?
-Pat
---
This sf.net email
:
ceforge.net Subject: RE:
[OS-webwork] Validation Framework doubt
See below
-Original Message-
From: Samuel Mota [mailto:[EMAIL PROTECTED]
Sent: Thursday, August 28, 2003 2:18 PM
To: [EMAIL PROTECTED]
Subject: RE: [OS-webwork] Validation Framework doubt
Hi Jason, guys,
Now the interceptor is working ... or should be working
Lightbody [mailto:[EMAIL PROTECTED]
Sent: Thursday, August 28, 2003 11:24 AM
To: [EMAIL PROTECTED]
Subject: Re: [OS-webwork] Validation Framework doubt
Jason,
One request -- when you move the logic in to an
interceptor... can you use a Lifecycle interface rather than
?
-Original Message-
From: Pat Lightbody [mailto:[EMAIL PROTECTED]
Sent: Thursday, August 28, 2003 11:24 AM
To: [EMAIL PROTECTED]
Subject: Re: [OS-webwork] Validation Framework doubt
Jason,
One request -- when you move the logic in to an
interceptor... can you use
Sorry, I'll work on putting an example of its use into the example app.
In the meantime, what this means is that it's going to add errors to the errors list
and the lists of errors in the map of fieldErrors. It WILL NOT stop execution just
because you have an error. You can apply the
13 matches
Mail list logo