RE: [OS-webwork] Validation Framework doubt

2003-09-02 Thread Samuel Mota
] [EMAIL PROTECTED]cc: ceforge.net Subject: RE: [OS-webwork] Validation Framework doubt

RE: [OS-webwork] Validation Framework doubt

2003-09-02 Thread Jason Carreira
I got it, but haven't had time to look yet. I'll take a look tonight. -Original Message- From: Samuel Mota [mailto:[EMAIL PROTECTED] Sent: Tuesday, September 02, 2003 10:23 AM To: [EMAIL PROTECTED] Subject: RE: [OS-webwork] Validation Framework doubt Jason, guys ... I've

RE: [OS-webwork] Validation Framework doubt

2003-09-01 Thread Samuel Mota
Hi, Continuing my doubts about this topic ... I'm debugging my form to see WHY even if I post some content at my validated fields (using the XWork validation framework and the interceptor) I get error messages. The field types are corret at the validation.xml file (ranges and so on) ... names

RE: [OS-webwork] Validation Framework doubt

2003-09-01 Thread Jason Carreira
and the param type in the setter are the same, or the Java introspector code can get confused. -Original Message- From: Samuel Mota [mailto:[EMAIL PROTECTED] Sent: Monday, September 01, 2003 9:08 AM To: [EMAIL PROTECTED] Subject: RE: [OS-webwork] Validation Framework doubt Hi

RE: [OS-webwork] Validation Framework doubt

2003-08-28 Thread Jason Carreira
[mailto:[EMAIL PROTECTED] Sent: Thursday, August 28, 2003 9:10 AM To: [EMAIL PROTECTED] Subject: RE: [OS-webwork] Validation Framework doubt Hi, map of fieldErrors. It WILL NOT stop execution just because you have an error. You can apply the DefaultWorkflowInterceptor after

Re: [OS-webwork] Validation Framework doubt

2003-08-28 Thread Pat Lightbody
Mota [mailto:[EMAIL PROTECTED] Sent: Thursday, August 28, 2003 9:10 AM To: [EMAIL PROTECTED] Subject: RE: [OS-webwork] Validation Framework doubt Hi, map of fieldErrors. It WILL NOT stop execution just because you have an error. You can apply the DefaultWorkflowInterceptor after

RE: [OS-webwork] Validation Framework doubt

2003-08-28 Thread Jason Carreira
on doing validations using the validation framework and anything else would be done in the execute() method. What do others think? -Original Message- From: Pat Lightbody [mailto:[EMAIL PROTECTED] Sent: Thursday, August 28, 2003 11:24 AM To: [EMAIL PROTECTED] Subject: Re: [OS-webwork

RE: [OS-webwork] Validation Framework doubt

2003-08-28 Thread roughley
] Subject: Re: [OS-webwork] Validation Framework doubt Jason, One request -- when you move the logic in to an interceptor... can you use a Lifecycle interface rather than reflection? -Pat --- This sf.net email

RE: [OS-webwork] Validation Framework doubt

2003-08-28 Thread Samuel Mota
: ceforge.net Subject: RE: [OS-webwork] Validation Framework doubt

RE: [OS-webwork] Validation Framework doubt

2003-08-28 Thread Jason Carreira
See below -Original Message- From: Samuel Mota [mailto:[EMAIL PROTECTED] Sent: Thursday, August 28, 2003 2:18 PM To: [EMAIL PROTECTED] Subject: RE: [OS-webwork] Validation Framework doubt Hi Jason, guys, Now the interceptor is working ... or should be working

RE: [OS-webwork] Validation Framework doubt

2003-08-28 Thread Jason Carreira
Lightbody [mailto:[EMAIL PROTECTED] Sent: Thursday, August 28, 2003 11:24 AM To: [EMAIL PROTECTED] Subject: Re: [OS-webwork] Validation Framework doubt Jason, One request -- when you move the logic in to an interceptor... can you use a Lifecycle interface rather than

RE: [OS-webwork] Validation Framework doubt

2003-08-28 Thread roughley
? -Original Message- From: Pat Lightbody [mailto:[EMAIL PROTECTED] Sent: Thursday, August 28, 2003 11:24 AM To: [EMAIL PROTECTED] Subject: Re: [OS-webwork] Validation Framework doubt Jason, One request -- when you move the logic in to an interceptor... can you use

RE: [OS-webwork] Validation Framework doubt

2003-08-27 Thread Jason Carreira
Sorry, I'll work on putting an example of its use into the example app. In the meantime, what this means is that it's going to add errors to the errors list and the lists of errors in the map of fieldErrors. It WILL NOT stop execution just because you have an error. You can apply the