On Tue, Feb 25, 2003 at 07:03:39PM -0800, Jason Carreira wrote:
> > -Original Message-
> > From: James Cook [mailto:[EMAIL PROTECTED]
> >
> > > > And eventually SLSB -> Action -> Web Tier?
> > > >
> > >
> > > Well, one would hope not. Again, it's dependent on how you're
> > > using you
On Tue, Feb 25, 2003 at 09:16:36PM -0500, James Cook wrote:
> > -Original Message-
> > From: [EMAIL PROTECTED]
> > [mailto:[EMAIL PROTECTED] On
> > Behalf Of Anders Engström
>
> > The idea is to make the actions "mobile" and move their place
> > of execution to the EJB-container. This w
> -Original Message-
> From: James Cook [mailto:[EMAIL PROTECTED]
>
> > > And eventually SLSB -> Action -> Web Tier?
> > >
> >
> > Well, one would hope not. Again, it's dependent on how you're
> > using you Actions.
>
> Gotcha, I just thought that was his intent because he said he
>
> -Original Message-
> From: [EMAIL PROTECTED]
> [mailto:[EMAIL PROTECTED] On
> Behalf Of Jason Carreira
> > And eventually SLSB -> Action -> Web Tier?
> >
>
> Well, one would hope not. Again, it's dependent on how you're
> using you Actions.
Gotcha, I just thought that was his int
> -Original Message-
> From: James Cook [mailto:[EMAIL PROTECTED]
>
> Maybe I'm missing it, but moving action execution to the
> EJB-tier is a good idea why? Why not just code some POJO's to
> perform the business logic on the EJB-tier. For more
> complicated workflow, the workflow eng
> -Original Message-
> From: [EMAIL PROTECTED]
> [mailto:[EMAIL PROTECTED] On
> Behalf Of Anders Engström
> The idea is to make the actions "mobile" and move their place
> of execution to the EJB-container. This way you minimize the
> amount of network use - instead of letting each act
> -Original Message-
> From: [EMAIL PROTECTED]
> [mailto:[EMAIL PROTECTED] On
> Behalf Of Jason Carreira
> I think his suggestion makes sense. It's a valid pattern, IMHO.
Maybe I'm missing it, but moving action execution to the EJB-tier is a
good idea why? Why not just code some POJO's
> -Original Message-
> From: [EMAIL PROTECTED]
> [mailto:[EMAIL PROTECTED] On
> Behalf Of Jason Carreira
> Sent: Tuesday, February 25, 2003 3:47 PM
> To: [EMAIL PROTECTED]
> Subject: RE: [OS-webwork] WW and Business Logic in EJB
>
>
>
>
> &
> This sounds Ok - but this might generate a lot of network round-trips
> from the web-tier <-> ejb-tier.
>
> > 2. Use a filter to implement similar logic.
* Allow request scoped interceptors. Solution is otherwise the same as
a filter. Request scoped interceptors are nice as filters are web bo
> -Original Message-
> From: Anders Engström [mailto:[EMAIL PROTECTED]
>
> > 3. Pull the code out of your SLSBs into POJOs and create a
> new wrapper
> > SLSB which puts together these POJO calls in the correct order /
> > workflow and call that from your Action.
> >
>
> I assume you
On Tue, Feb 25, 2003 at 12:46:57PM -0800, Jason Carreira wrote:
>
>
> > -Original Message-
> > From: James Cook [mailto:[EMAIL PROTECTED]
> >
> > Sorry but this doesn't make much sense to me. When you say Actions, I
> > guess you are not referring to WW actions. If you are, I
> > thin
On Tue, Feb 25, 2003 at 03:38:11PM -0500, James Cook wrote:
> On Tuesday, February 25, 2003, at 02:54 PM, Anders Engström wrote:
>
> >We want each HTTP-request to run under the scope of one transaction in
> >the business layer. This is where I need some advice - how do we best
> >utilize WW to ach
> -Original Message-
> From: James Cook [mailto:[EMAIL PROTECTED]
>
> Sorry but this doesn't make much sense to me. When you say Actions, I
> guess you are not referring to WW actions. If you are, I
> think you may
> need to re-read some documentation. :-)
I think his suggestion mak
On Tuesday, February 25, 2003, at 02:54 PM, Anders Engström wrote:
We want each HTTP-request to run under the scope of one transaction in
the business layer. This is where I need some advice - how do we best
utilize WW to achieve this?
Most of the transactions in our application are initiated on t
14 matches
Mail list logo
