-Original Message-
From: Erik Beeson [mailto:[EMAIL PROTECTED]]
Sent: Thursday, January 30, 2003 7:57 PM
To: [EMAIL PROTECTED]
Subject: Re: [OS-webwork] Partition XWork [Was: Re: XWork flux]
Jason says 7 jars, Hani says 1, Pat says 2. I have two things to say.
Ummm... No. I
+1
- Original Message -
From: Jason Carreira [EMAIL PROTECTED]
To: [EMAIL PROTECTED]
Sent: Thursday, January 30, 2003 9:18 AM
Subject: RE: [OS-webwork] Partition XWork [Was: Re: XWork flux]
See
http://www.opensymphony.com:8668/space/XWork+1.0+Mission+Statement
And
http
Jason Carreira wrote:
So the real question here is whether it makes sense to partition Webwork 2.0 into:
Webwork-core
Webwork-el
Webwork-jsp
Webwork-velocity
Webwork-xslt
Webwork-jasperreports
Webwork-freemarket
There may be later extensions to Xwork as well (JMSWork?, MailWork?).
Personally,
I think that two jars is a good middle ground:
xwork-1.0.jar
webwork-2.0.jar
This is what we've been planning on all along.
-Pat
- Original Message -
From: Hani Suleiman [EMAIL PROTECTED]
To: [EMAIL PROTECTED]
Sent: Thursday, January 30, 2003 4:26 PM
Subject: Re: [OS-webwork] Partition
