+1
Great!
Eero
2017-02-23 22:20 GMT+02:00 Jochen Dehm :
> Yes, that's right. The fingerprint is the problem.
>
> But with the user nobody is not so simple to implement.
>
> root@sv-openvas /tmp # su - nobody -s /bin/bash
> No directory, Registration withHOME=/
>
>
This is not necessary, as I explained later in the last message.
Everything now works perfectly.
___
Openvas-discuss mailing list
Openvas-discuss@wald.intevation.org
https://lists.wald.intevation.org/cgi-bin/mailman/listinfo/openvas-discuss
Am 23.02.2017 um 21:20 schrieb Jochen Dehm:
Yes, that's right. The fingerprint is the problem.
But with the user nobody is not so simple to implement.
root@sv-openvas /tmp # su - nobody -s /bin/bash
No directory, Registration withHOME=/
nobody@sv-openvas:/tmp$ scp -o HashKnownHosts=no
Yes, that's right. The fingerprint is the problem.
But with the user nobody is not so simple to implement.
root@sv-openvas /tmp # su - nobody -s /bin/bash
No directory, Registration withHOME=/
nobody@sv-openvas:/tmp$ scp -o HashKnownHosts=no test.csv
root@192.168.1.119:/root/csv-reports
Hi all,
I understand that Openvas 9 doesn’t support slave entity anymore.
Can anyone explain how they should be configured through the new OMP protocol?
Best regards,
Udi.
___
Openvas-discuss mailing list
Openvas-discuss@wald.intevation.org