It is CVSS version 2.
Chandra.
www.scaprepo.com
-Original Message-
From: Openvas-discuss [mailto:openvas-discuss-boun...@wald.intevation.org]
On Behalf Of Masafumi Inoue
Sent: Friday, August 03, 2012 11:17 AM
To: openvas-discuss@wald.intevation.org
Subject: [Openvas-discuss] CVSS
Hi,
Ran a successful Atom install yesterday on a fresh CentOS 6.3 VM. Only
glitch was had to run openvas-setup twice, as the first time froze. At that
point everything looked good.
So I ran the default scan against a remote /27 I admin. Ran for about 3-1/2
hours, apparently successfully. But the
2012/8/3 Whit Blauvelt w...@transpect.com:
Hi,
Ran a successful Atom install yesterday on a fresh CentOS 6.3 VM. Only
glitch was had to run openvas-setup twice, as the first time froze. At that
point everything looked good.
So I ran the default scan against a remote /27 I admin. Ran for
On Fri, Aug 03, 2012 at 03:01:15PM +0200, Henri Doreau wrote:
do you have nmap installed on the scanner box? Although nmap is not a
hard requirement for OpenVAS, the scanner is able to leverage it and
this can dramatically improve accuracy of the network exploration
phase.
Thanks for the
On Fri, Aug 03, 2012 at 09:30:51AM -0400, Whit Blauvelt wrote:
On Fri, Aug 03, 2012 at 03:01:15PM +0200, Henri Doreau wrote:
do you have nmap installed on the scanner box? Although nmap is not a
hard requirement for OpenVAS, the scanner is able to leverage it and
this can dramatically
On Fri, Aug 03, 2012 at 03:42:28PM +0200, Stefan Schwarz wrote:
Yes, you should enable nmap under Post scanners in your actual
scan config. Be also sure to set your port list correctly although
typical service ports should be within predefined config.
Thanks. Assuming you meant Port scanners,
Okay, this gets weirder. I did a full reinstall, this time on a Fedora 15
VM. Again I used the Atomicorp method. In some ways the result is far
improved:
1. The same scan profile ran in under an hour, rather than over 3.
2. The openvassd.log file now looks clean - no segfaults!
But in other
Very weird issue, it seems get_reports isn't returning all the data?
Thoughts? 192.168.1.5 is running 11.10 Ubuntu using the OBS repos.
bperry@w00den-pickle:~$ omp -h 192.168.1.5 --verbose --username admin
--password password --xml get_reports
report_id=\2ab6c9e7-449c-4893-ab86-ca34250b1c95\ /
The exact same thing happens with a custom client written in C#, so it
has to be happening server side.
On Fri, Aug 3, 2012 at 11:53 PM, Brandon Perry
bperry.volat...@gmail.com wrote:
Very weird issue, it seems get_reports isn't returning all the data?
Thoughts? 192.168.1.5 is running 11.10
