On Montag, 9. März 2009, Christian Eric Edjenguele wrote:
> one idea to avoid duplicate plugin development or feature for openvas,
> must be to set a trac base system (http://trac.edgewall.org/), like, but
> must powerful than the actual tracker.
> developer could also be able to add features there for proposal.
>
> what do you think ?
the discussion trac vs. GForge has a long record. Both have their
advantages and disadvantages.
A migration would consume lots of manpower and I do not see real
showstoppers in the coordinaton of the developments.
Best is to though in the plans one has into the mailing list or into IRC.
The development team is (yet) small enough to coordinate at this
informal level.
Once the team get bigger, we indeed might need to think
about some more formal processes.
Best
Jan
--
Dr. Jan-Oliver Wagner | ++49-541-335083-0 | http://www.intevation.de/
Intevation GmbH, Neuer Graben 17, 49074 Osnabrück | AG Osnabrück, HR B 18998
Geschäftsführer: Frank Koormann, Bernhard Reiter, Dr. Jan-Oliver Wagner
_______________________________________________
Openvas-discuss mailing list
Openvas-discuss@wald.intevation.org
http://lists.wald.intevation.org/mailman/listinfo/openvas-discuss
