On Mon, Jun 29, 2009 at 11:06:45AM +0200, Felix Wolfsteller wrote:
I do not know the state of nessus as of 2005 but I guess that OpenVAS is
heading in a different direction than what nessus was headed to back than.
The patches probably can be forward ported easily. But I have not tried.
On Fri, Aug 28, 2009 at 11:29:07AM +0200, Felix Wolfsteller wrote:
Hi John,
great offer!
Just came to my mind:
* Jan mentioned the manpage for openvas-nvt-sync is missing (not really sure
if we need one).
I wrote one already yesterday for the Debian package. Please review the
attached
On Thu, Apr 23, 2009 at 10:11:46AM +0200, Michael Wiegand wrote:
I would like your opinions regarding the following issues:
- What would be the consequences of discontinuing the tarball release?
There should not be installations which use only the tarball and never
sync, should there?
On Sun, Dec 30, 2007 at 12:37:20AM +, Tim Brown wrote:
On Saturday 29 December 2007 22:49:09 Javier Fernández-Sanguino Peña wrote:
And I have just uploaded to Debian's queue.
Good stuff, I assume my choice of dpatch for the ongoing patching for
gdchart was okay? Now we need to get
On Tue, Nov 27, 2007 at 08:34:14AM +, Tim Brown wrote:
On Friday 23 November 2007 22:23:01 Jan-Oliver Wagner wrote:
Javier, Tim,
any news about the progress of the Debian uptake of OpenVAS client and
server packages?
Anything I can do?
IMO we have resolved the copyright issues
As you see in the email below, the openvas-client package was rejected from
Debian based on the contents of doc/WARNING.En, this document describes the
risks of running Nessus and starts saying:
0. Copyright
This document was written by Michel Arboi [EMAIL PROTECTED]
Anybody may reproduce it,
On Thu, Jul 26, 2007 at 05:05:29PM +0200, Renaud Deraison (lists) wrote:
We announced the plugin feed alongside the release of Nessus 2.2.1,
Ok. I stand corrected, it was 2.2.1, not 2.2.4. Still some of the NASL
plugins we're talking about were including even in 2.0.9.
and we made clear at
On Thu, Jul 26, 2007 at 12:07:12AM +0200, Jan-Oliver Wagner wrote:
Hi,
I've had a closer look at openvas-plugins.
As Renaud suggested, I applied
$ grep -i script_copyright.*Tenable.* scripts/*
and got these hits:
(...)
These plugins where included in the 2.2.4 release, which IIRC, was
On Wed, May 30, 2007 at 12:20:01AM +0100, Tim Brown wrote:
Anyone thinking of attending DebConf this year? I'm going and will be
wearing my OpenVAS hat when appropriate. One thing I'm aiming to tackle is
the delisting (or rather the never listing) of OpenVAS as an SPI project,
since as far
On Thu, May 17, 2007 at 11:41:12PM -0400, Oliver Day wrote:
I have been contacted by Tenable. They are pretty sure
some plugins in openvas-plugins module are present
that should not be there due to never being GPL licensed.
Basically it should at least be anything that matches
grep -i
10 matches
Mail list logo
