On 2/19/08, Jan-Oliver Wagner [EMAIL PROTECTED] wrote:
Hi,
I'd like to call for voting on the change requests #1 - #4,
listed here:
http://www.openvas.org/openvas-crs.html
Naturally, I am in favour of all 4 of them :-)
I'm in favour of all 4 too.
Sergio,
Hi,
On Wednesday 20 February 2008 01:08, Jan-Oliver Wagner wrote:
I'd like to call for voting on the change requests #1 - #4,
listed here:
http://www.openvas.org/openvas-crs.html
I'm in favor of all four change requests.
Bernhard
pgp26NSOr46EY.pgp
Description: PGP signature
On Mittwoch, 20. Februar 2008, Thomas Reinke wrote:
#2 Insufficient knowledge of use scenarios to form a vote opinion, but
comments as follows:
NSR is, AFAIK, not broken w.r.t semi-colons. The actual NTP
protocol has the same issue of being line oriented - the server
#1 Adding script_oid(): In favour.
#2 Insufficient knowledge of use scenarios to form a vote opinion, but
comments as follows:
NSR is, AFAIK, not broken w.r.t semi-colons. The actual NTP
protocol has the same issue of being line oriented - the server
replaces all semi-colons with
Hi,
I'd like to call for voting on the change requests #1 - #4,
listed here:
http://www.openvas.org/openvas-crs.html
Naturally, I am in favour of all 4 of them :-)
However, please read and judge whether it is a good
or bad idea or wether it needs further refinement.
I am not totally sure
On Wednesday 20 February 2008 00:08:24 Jan-Oliver Wagner wrote:
Hi,
I'd like to call for voting on the change requests #1 - #4,
listed here:
http://www.openvas.org/openvas-crs.html
Naturally, I am in favour of all 4 of them :-)
However, please read and judge whether it is a good
or bad
On Feb 19, 2008 7:35 PM, Tim Brown [EMAIL PROTECTED] wrote:
On Wednesday 20 February 2008 00:08:24 Jan-Oliver Wagner wrote:
Hi,
I'd like to call for voting on the change requests #1 - #4,
listed here:
http://www.openvas.org/openvas-crs.html
Naturally, I am in favour of all 4 of