Am 16.02.2011 22:55, schrieb Gilles Espinasse:
> Seen with gcc-4.4.5 and -Wformat -Wformat-security
>
> Signed-off-by: Gilles Espinasse
> ---
> options.c |6 +++---
> push.c|4 ++--
> 2 files changed, 5 insertions(+), 5 deletions(-)
Good catch, patch approved.
--
Hi all,
Lately I've been thinking of ways to improve our ACK/NACK system so that
patches could get merged _or_ rejected faster. There have some cases
where no clear resolution has been reached, one example being the
floating-tls patch[1]. The way I see it, whether a patch should be
merged into
-BEGIN PGP SIGNED MESSAGE-
Hash: SHA1
On 16/02/11 22:55, Gilles Espinasse wrote:
| Seen with gcc-4.4.5 and -Wformat -Wformat-security
|
| Signed-off-by: Gilles Espinasse
| ---
| options.c |6 +++---
| push.c|4 ++--
| 2 files changed, 5 insertions(+), 5