Re: [Openvpn-devel] [PATCH] Bind only to specified interface

2011-03-09 Thread Federico Heinz
On 09/03/2011, Markus Kötter wrote: > David Sommerseth wrote: > > One is that you do resolve the IP address based on the device > > name. What if the IP address changes on that device? It would > > be anticipated by most users that it would then listen to the new > > IP address. When being done

Re: [Openvpn-devel] OpenVPN 2.2-RC released

2011-03-09 Thread Alon Bar-Lev
Can you please send the patch again? On Wed, Mar 9, 2011 at 4:39 PM, Markus Koetter wrote: > > Hi, > > On 03/04/2011 08:26 PM, Samuli Seppänen wrote: > >      * Make the --x509-username-field feature an opt-in feature > > given the x509 username field is

Re: [Openvpn-devel] OpenVPN 2.2-RC released

2011-03-09 Thread Markus Koetter
Hi, On 03/04/2011 08:26 PM, Samuli Seppänen wrote: * Make the --x509-username-field feature an opt-in feature given the x509 username field is optional now, any chance to get x509 v3 extensions as username [1] merged if they are made opt-in too? Markus [1]

Re: [Openvpn-devel] [PATCH] Bind only to specified interface

2011-03-09 Thread Markus Kötter
Hi, any reason this list does not send a proper reply-to-list? David Sommerseth wrote: One is that you do resolve the IP address based on the device name. What if the IP address changes on that device? It would be anticipated by most users that it would then listen to the new IP address.

Re: [Openvpn-devel] [PATCH] Bind only to specified interface

2011-03-09 Thread Federico Heinz
On 09/03/2011, Gert Doering wrote: > I can understand why this feature is desirable - there are a couple > of problems with the implementation, though. > - From a code modularity point of view, socket stuff should not go >to options.c, but to socket.c I understand that with "socket stuff"

Re: [Openvpn-devel] [PATCH] Bind only to specified interface

2011-03-09 Thread Federico Heinz
-BEGIN PGP SIGNED MESSAGE- Hash: SHA1 On 09/03/2011, David Sommerseth wrote: > Even though that shell trick isn't so obvious, I would say it > solves exactly the same thing. It's not as pretty, but your patch > does not give any extra advantages either. It provides the only advantage it

[Openvpn-devel] Windows 7 64-bit DCHP NAK bomb debugging at 19:00 UTC

2011-03-09 Thread Samuli Seppänen
Hi, Today we're having a debugging session on #openvpn-de...@irc.freenode.net at 19:00 UTC regarding this topic: This is probably related: JJK and James Yonan are going to be there, as

Re: [Openvpn-devel] [PATCH] Bind only to specified interface

2011-03-09 Thread David Sommerseth
-BEGIN PGP SIGNED MESSAGE- Hash: SHA1 On 09/03/11 01:05, Federico Heinz wrote: | On 09/03/2011, Alon Bar-Lev wrote: |> I don't understand why it is needed. |> You can always start openvpn and override configuration via |> command-line. |> So add --local "$(/sbin/ip addr show dev wlan0 |

Re: [Openvpn-devel] [PATCH] Bind only to specified interface

2011-03-09 Thread Federico Heinz
On 09/03/2011, Alon Bar-Lev wrote: > I don't understand why it is needed. > You can always start openvpn and override configuration via > command-line. > So add --local "$(/sbin/ip addr show dev wlan0 | grep inet | sed > 's#.*inet \(.*\)/.*#\1#')" parameter while starting it. Sure: there's a huge