[Openvpn-devel] regressions in openvpn 2.4.1

2017-05-08 Thread Farkas Levente
hi, after we upgrade our servers and client to 2.4.1 we detect many regressions. - first was that with this the server no longer works and the server restart fail after upgrade. imho it's not a safe behavior. but it was easy to fix at least. script-security 2 system - then the new systemd unit

[Openvpn-devel] how to report bug

2013-06-13 Thread Farkas Levente
hi, what is the current prefered way to report bug in openvpn? trac? eg is there any chance to this will be fixed? https://community.openvpn.net/openvpn/ticket/225 regards. -- Levente "Si vis pacem para bellum!"

Re: [Openvpn-devel] Documentation and alternative SSL backend patches

2010-12-02 Thread Farkas Levente
On 12/02/2010 12:10 PM, Matthias Andree wrote: > Am 02.12.2010 10:46, schrieb Farkas Levente: >> On 12/02/2010 10:05 AM, Adriaan de Jong wrote: >>> Hi List, >>> >>> We've been working on OpenVPN in preparation for a security evaluation. >>> This enta

Re: [Openvpn-devel] Documentation and alternative SSL backend patches

2010-12-02 Thread Farkas Levente
On 12/02/2010 10:05 AM, Adriaan de Jong wrote: > Hi List, > > We've been working on OpenVPN in preparation for a security evaluation. This > entailed documenting OpenVPN at a relatively high level, removing the > dependencies on OpenSSL, and adding support for a simpler, easier to evaluate >

[Openvpn-devel] server log not very useful

2010-03-22 Thread Farkas Levente
hi, if i set in my server's config: tls-server and on the client's conf: remote-cert-tls server ns-cert-type server then if i generate a new cert for the server and forget to set it to server, then it's very hard to find out the problem. ie. neither from the server nor the client's log file

Re: [Openvpn-devel] [PATCH] openvpn over ipv6 support -v0.4.6

2009-09-26 Thread Farkas Levente
any change to megre it into upstream openvpn? On 09/26/2009 04:05 PM, Bernhard Schmidt wrote: JuanJo Ciarlante wrote: Hello JuanJo, I'm(back) working on openvpn/ipv6 endpoint support, aka udp6/tcp6, please refer to README.ipv6[1] and TODO.ipv6[2] for more details. All

Re: [Openvpn-devel] version 2.1

2009-05-05 Thread Farkas Levente
Carsten Krüger wrote: > Hello, > >> wouldn't be it better to release the current version as 2.1 and all >> upcoming bugfix can be put into post 2.1? > > +1 > But kick OpenVPN GUI from installer, it is unmaintained old crap (needs > adminrights, didn't use management interface) > > Please set a

[Openvpn-devel] version 2.1

2009-05-04 Thread Farkas Levente
hi, it's about 3 years since openvpn-2.1 is beta and almost everyone useing the beta version since there is no final release. wouldn't be it better to release the current version as 2.1 and all upcoming bugfix can be put into post 2.1? -- Levente "Si vis pacem

Re: [Openvpn-devel] [Openvpn-users] OpenVPN 2.0.8 and 2.1_beta15 released

2006-09-12 Thread Farkas Levente
James Yonan wrote: > Farkas Levente wrote: >> James Yonan wrote: >> >>> 2006.09.12 -- Version 2.0.8 >>> >>> * Windows installer updated with OpenSSL 0.9.7k DLLs to fix >>> RSA Signature Forgery (CVE-2006-4339). >>> >

Re: [Openvpn-devel] [Openvpn-users] OpenVPN 2.0.8 and 2.1_beta15 released

2006-09-12 Thread Farkas Levente
James Yonan wrote: > 2006.09.12 -- Version 2.0.8 > > * Windows installer updated with OpenSSL 0.9.7k DLLs to fix > RSA Signature Forgery (CVE-2006-4339). > > * No changes to OpenVPN source code between 2.0.7 and 2.0.8. > > 2006.09.12 -- Version 2.1-beta15 hi, is there any

[Openvpn-devel] openvpn 2.1 release

2006-07-12 Thread Farkas Levente
hi, is there any know bug in the current 2.1 beta tree? if not can we wait a final release of 2.1 in the near future? yours. -- Levente "Si vis pacem para bellum!"

[Openvpn-devel] a few problem/comment/bug with version 2.1.x

2006-06-06 Thread Farkas Levente
hi, we now try to migrate from openvpn 1.x to 2.1 topology and we's a few problems and comments about the new versions and a few questions. we would like to give each client a fixed ip addresses and some of them have an own subnet behind it. the server use the server 192.168.254.0 255.255.255.0

[Openvpn-devel] Re: [Openvpn-users] New subnet topology feature ready for testing

2005-09-08 Thread Farkas Levente
James Yonan wrote: OpenVPN Addressing Topology --- However, now I've put together a brand new topology, called "topology subnet". This topology is very intuitive, like the "dev tap" topology where each client gets a single IP address from a pool, the server gets the .1

[Openvpn-devel] pocket pc port again

2005-05-05 Thread Farkas Levente
hi, i search the archive and see there are a few people who'd like to run openvpn in his pocket pc. i just like to know is there any plan to port openvpn to pocket pc too? this can be one of the main usage of openvpn in the near future. since more and more people has some kind of pda

[Openvpn-devel] small patch for the spec.in file

2004-03-31 Thread Farkas Levente
hi, here is my small patch for the spec.in file in order not to overwrite the old config files. --- openvpn.spec.in.lfarkas 2004-03-31 18:11:14.0 +0200 +++ openvpn.spec.in 2004-03-31 18:13:25.0 +0200 @@ -34,9 +34,9 @@ %__install -c -m 755 %{name}.8

Re: [Openvpn-users] Re: [Openvpn-devel] OpenVPN 2.0 -- Project Update and Release Notes

2004-03-31 Thread Farkas Levente
James Yonan wrote: Farkas Levente <lfar...@bppiac.hu> said: first of all THANKS! James Yonan wrote: * Add an internal routing capability to the OpenVPN server to allow client-to-client communication, without going through the tun interface on the server. why this is needed? an

[Openvpn-devel] one more request for usability

2004-03-07 Thread Farkas Levente
hi, a few mounth ago I requested the redirect-gateway feature and James was so kind to implement that feature. we use it but have to face another problem. our windows 2000/xp road-warrior clinets are not so "road warrior". this means that the clinets has a DSL connection over which we use

[Openvpn-devel] one more request for usability

2004-03-07 Thread Farkas Levente
hi, a few mounth ago I requested the redirect-gateway feature and James was so kind to implement that feature. we use it but have to face another problem. our windows 2000/xp road-warrior clinets are not so "road warrior". this means that the clinets has a DSL connection over which we use

Re: [Openvpn-devel] option suggestion (was Re: routing on windows)

2003-11-01 Thread Farkas Levente
James Yonan wrote: Farkas Levente <lfar...@bnap.hu> said: Mathias Sundman wrote: Hi! > we use our linux vpn gateway and some win2000 road warrior clients with > openvpn. I would like to route all internet traffic trough our firewall > from the windows clients. I´ve been

[Openvpn-devel] option suggestion (was Re: routing on windows)

2003-10-31 Thread Farkas Levente
Mathias Sundman wrote: Hi! > we use our linux vpn gateway and some win2000 road warrior clients with > openvpn. I would like to route all internet traffic trough our firewall > from the windows clients. I´ve been thinking about doing this too, but never accually tried it. What you