Hello All,
I'm looking forward to hearing from you guys a feedback if the patch for
the features added to the NAT will be accepted or not or if is there
anything else that I need to do or change in order to have it merged into
the code.
>From the previous replies, it seems that a minor change was
In certain cases we did exactly that. We used a linux appliance optimized
as a router + OpenVPN. But the instances where we could get away with that
is a small percentage of our installed base. Unfortunately the majority of
those sites require the Windows box because of other requisite proprieta
Hi,
On Thu, Aug 27, 2015 at 09:18:12AM +1200, Jason Haar wrote:
> On 26/08/15 20:35, Arne Schwabe wrote:
> > Okay yes. Active FTP is broken by our simple nat implementation. But I
> > think FTP, let alone active FTP is dead. I am not sure if we should
> > support this in our simple NAT implementat
Author: Rafael Gava de Oliveira
I wanted to give an ACK to both of Gava’s patches 1) client-nat
localhost/client-ip patch and 2) active ftp patch.
We had asked Gava to develop these patches so that we could use OpenVPN in
our remote service network. We currently have OpenVPN 2.3.5 with this
pa
On 26/08/15 20:35, Arne Schwabe wrote:
> Okay yes. Active FTP is broken by our simple nat implementation. But I
> think FTP, let alone active FTP is dead. I am not sure if we should
> support this in our simple NAT implementation.
I agree. Surely this would be the beginning of a complete beat-up? I
Hi JJK,
"client-ip" instead of "localhost" sounds good to me.
BR
Gava
On Wed, Aug 26, 2015 at 10:01 AM, Jan Just Keijser
wrote:
> Hi,
>
> Rafael Gava wrote:
>
>>
>> this is my first submission to the list and I hope that I'm doing in the
>> right way. :-)
>>
>>
>> Well, the features added to
Hi,
Rafael Gava wrote:
this is my first submission to the list and I hope that I'm doing in
the right way. :-)
Well, the features added to Network Address Translator are:
1) Allow the user to use the string "localhost" on the client-nat
network configuration in a way that is not necessary
Hi Arne, thanks for the prompt feedback.
please see comments in-line:
Thanks in advance,
Rafael
On Wed, Aug 26, 2015 at 5:35 AM, Arne Schwabe wrote:
>
>
> Am 26.08.15 um 03:43 schrieb Rafael Gava:
>
> Hi,
>
> this is my first submission to the list and I hope that I'm doing in the
> right way
Am 26.08.15 um 03:43 schrieb Rafael Gava:
> Hi,
>
> this is my first submission to the list and I hope that I'm doing in
> the right way. :-)
>
Yes submitting patches to the list is the preferred way. I haven't
looked in the patch yet. I am first trying to understand the goal of the
patches.
>
>
Hi,
this is my first submission to the list and I hope that I'm doing in the
right way. :-)
Well, the features added to Network Address Translator are:
1) Allow the user to use the string "localhost" on the client-nat network
configuration in a way that is not necessary to inform the IP address
10 matches
Mail list logo
