Sorry for the late response, but better late then never. So, ACK to this
patch!
-Steffan
On 25-11-13 13:32, David Sommerseth wrote:
> From: David Sommerseth
>
> Commit 0f2bc0dd92f43c9 started to introduce some file sanity
> checking before OpenVPN started to avoid harder to explain issues
> due
Hi,
On Tue, Nov 26, 2013 at 12:15:09PM +0100, David Sommerseth wrote:
> and Gert will apply whatever gets an ACK I presume :)
ACK! :)
(On that statement, not on the patch, all my brains are focused on the
dual-stack patch set)
gert
--
USENET is *not* the non-clickable part of WWW!
On 23. nov. 2013 10:53, Steffan Karger wrote:
> Hi David,
>
> This solution looks good. I did not test, but I do have one minor
> comment after glancing at the code:
>
> @@ -2662,7 +2700,14 @@ check_cmd_access(const char *command, const
> char *opt) * only requires X_OK to function on Unix - a scen
From: David Sommerseth
Commit 0f2bc0dd92f43c9 started to introduce some file sanity
checking before OpenVPN started to avoid harder to explain issues
due to missing files or directories later on. But that commit
did not consider --chroot at all. Which would basically cause
OpenVPN to complain o
Hi David,
This solution looks good. I did not test, but I do have one minor comment
after glancing at the code:
@@ -2662,7 +2700,14 @@ check_cmd_access(const char *command, const char
> *opt)
> * only requires X_OK to function on Unix - a scenario not unlikely to
> * be seen on suid
From: David Sommerseth
Commit 0f2bc0dd92f43c9 started to introduce some file sanity
checking before OpenVPN started to avoid harder to explain issues
due to missing files or directories later on. But that commit
did not consider --chroot at all. Which would basically cause
OpenVPN to complain o
