Matthias Andree wrote:
If OpenSSL is in the base system of FreeBSD, then there shouldn't be any
problem linking LZO with it.
You could also allow OpenVPN binaries without LZO support (as I
currently do in Debian).
This will break compatibility and is no longer needed in the light of
the special
> If OpenSSL is in the base system of FreeBSD, then there shouldn't be any
> problem linking LZO with it.
> You could also allow OpenVPN binaries without LZO support (as I
> currently do in Debian).
This will break compatibility and is no longer needed in the light of
the special permission Markus
On Fri, May 02, 2003 at 06:07:07PM +0200, Matthias Andree wrote:
> On Mon, 28 Apr 2003, Alberto Gonzalez Iniesta wrote:
>
> > Sorry for the huge forward, but everything needed to understand this
> > problem should be there :)
>
> FYI:
>
> My post of the FreeBSD-ports mailing list how I should ha
On Mon, 28 Apr 2003, Alberto Gonzalez Iniesta wrote:
> Sorry for the huge forward, but everything needed to understand this
> problem should be there :)
FYI:
My post of the FreeBSD-ports mailing list how I should handle this
license issue LZO <-> OpenSSL hasn't turned up anything in some days; s
Aaron Sethman wrote:
On Mon, 28 Apr 2003, bishop wrote:
So, what do we do? We write an exeption in a GPL-licensed project's
software license? That only seems shady on the surface, like one's
trying to exempt oneself from someone else's licensing - -I'd like to do
that with MS. In fact, th
On Mon, 28 Apr 2003, bishop wrote:
> >> Of course another option here is to consider getting OpenVPN to play nice
> >> with gnutls, though I am not familiary with the maturity of that piece of
> >> software.
>
> Does anyone else here consider this to be entirely the wrong way to go?
I'm not sayin
Of course another option here is to consider getting OpenVPN to play nice
with gnutls, though I am not familiary with the maturity of that piece of
software.
Does anyone else here consider this to be entirely the wrong way to go?
First off, the problem appears to be one that's present in all ca
On Mon, 28 Apr 2003, Alberto Gonzalez Iniesta wrote:
> Hi all,
>
> Sorry for the huge forward, but everything needed to understand this
> problem should be there :)
>
> GPL software does not mix well with OpenSSL, and that's giving me some
> headaches lately. As you me see in my mail to Markus (li
Hi all,
Sorry for the huge forward, but everything needed to understand this
problem should be there :)
GPL software does not mix well with OpenSSL, and that's giving me some
headaches lately. As you me see in my mail to Markus (liblzo author) and
James (we all know who he is :) linking liblzo wi
