Re: [Openvpn-devel] OVPN patching process RE: [PATCH] Fix non-C89 comments

David, A couple issues with the patch: * sscanf usage doesn't check for buffer overflow. * You use gw_if_name in some places and gw_ifname in other places. To eliminate confusion it would be best to use a consistent form. Also, to reiterate, try submitting the patch as an attachment to

Re: [Openvpn-devel] OVPN patching process RE: [PATCH] Fix non-C89 comments

On 1/29/09, David Balazic wrote: > Hi! > > I sent a patch recently to the openvpn-devel list and got > no reply whatsoever. Did I miss something ? Is there a procedure > that I did not follow ? Send the patch again. At the subject specify [PATCH] Place the