Il 02/11/2016 12:55, David Sommerseth ha scritto:
> -BEGIN PGP SIGNED MESSAGE-
> Hash: SHA1
>
> On 02/11/16 10:32, Steffan Karger wrote:
>> Hi,
>>
>> On 2 November 2016 at 09:48, Alberto Gonzalez Iniesta
>> wrote:
>>> I don't know if 2.4 addresses building with openssl 1.1 [1], but
>>> tha
Hi,
On 01-11-16 23:47, David Sommerseth wrote:
>
> [...]
>
> * November 8th
> If we agree to have 3 stages, alpha3 must be released. After this
> date we start to be stricter about the patches for a while.
>
> Patches which should go into this or the next release:
> - [PATCH] struct arg
-BEGIN PGP SIGNED MESSAGE-
Hash: SHA1
On 02/11/16 10:32, Steffan Karger wrote:
> Hi,
>
> On 2 November 2016 at 09:48, Alberto Gonzalez Iniesta
> wrote:
>> I don't know if 2.4 addresses building with openssl 1.1 [1], but
>> that would be a plus.
>
> Not yet. The 1.1 API in considerably d
Hi,
On 2 November 2016 at 09:48, Alberto Gonzalez Iniesta wrote:
> I don't know if 2.4 addresses building with openssl 1.1 [1], but that
> would be a plus.
Not yet. The 1.1 API in considerably different from 1.0.x. Switching
is not very hard, but supporting both 1.0.x and 1.1 needs some work.
I
On Wed, Nov 02, 2016 at 10:12:59AM +0200, Samuli Seppänen wrote:
> Il 02/11/2016 00:52, Arne Schwabe ha scritto:
> > On 01.11.2016 23:47, David Sommerseth wrote:
> >>
> >> I'm splitting of the originating thread to a new one, to refocus the
> >> discussion.
> >>
> >> On 01/11/16 15:56, Samuli Seppä
Il 02/11/2016 00:52, Arne Schwabe ha scritto:
> On 01.11.2016 23:47, David Sommerseth wrote:
>>
>> I'm splitting of the originating thread to a new one, to refocus the
>> discussion.
>>
>> On 01/11/16 15:56, Samuli Seppänen wrote:
>>> Il 01/11/2016 16:05, David Sommerseth ha scritto:
[...snip.
On 01.11.2016 23:47, David Sommerseth wrote:
>
> I'm splitting of the originating thread to a new one, to refocus the
> discussion.
>
> On 01/11/16 15:56, Samuli Seppänen wrote:
> > Il 01/11/2016 16:05, David Sommerseth ha scritto:
> >> [...snip...]
> >>
> I still think the timeline "end of 20
-BEGIN PGP SIGNED MESSAGE-
Hash: SHA1
I'm splitting of the originating thread to a new one, to refocus the
discussion.
On 01/11/16 15:56, Samuli Seppänen wrote:
> Il 01/11/2016 16:05, David Sommerseth ha scritto:
>> [...snip...]
>>
I still think the timeline "end of 2016" should be
