Re: [Openvpn-devel] PolarSSL 1.1.0 support?

> Hi, > > On Thu, Jun 07, 2012 at 11:48:37AM +0200, Paul Bakker wrote: >> Agreed as well.. > So what...? 1.1.4 or "1.1.0, and put the responsibility on the distro"? > I think this question is related to our project policies, not just to PolarSSL support. Do we want to try to protect packagers

Re: [Openvpn-devel] PolarSSL 1.1.0 support?

Hi, On Thu, Jun 07, 2012 at 12:36:51PM +0200, Paul Bakker wrote: > On 7-6-2012 12:25, Gert Doering wrote: > > So what...? 1.1.4 or "1.1.0, and put the responsibility on the distro"? > 1.1.0 and put the respsonsibility on the distro! Ok - so I'll ACK the patch Alon has posted as well. Thanks. >

Re: [Openvpn-devel] PolarSSL 1.1.0 support?

On 7-6-2012 12:25, Gert Doering wrote: > > So what...? 1.1.4 or "1.1.0, and put the responsibility on the distro"? 1.1.0 and put the respsonsibility on the distro! > > (How's the work on blowfish going? Only semi-joking, as I'd really like > to run cross-ssl-library client tests on the

Re: [Openvpn-devel] PolarSSL 1.1.0 support?

Hi, On Thu, Jun 07, 2012 at 11:48:37AM +0200, Paul Bakker wrote: > Agreed as well.. So what...? 1.1.4 or "1.1.0, and put the responsibility on the distro"? (How's the work on blowfish going? Only semi-joking, as I'd really like to run cross-ssl-library client tests on the buildslaves,

Re: [Openvpn-devel] PolarSSL 1.1.0 support?

I'd go for >= 1.1.4 Since 1.1.2 does not handle empty packets correctly. On 7-6-2012 11:35, Frank de Brabander wrote: > Maybe this should actually be changed to >= 1.1.2, since there is a > security issue with versions from 0.99-pre4 up to and including PolarSSL > 1.1.1. > > On 07-06-12 11:24,

Re: [Openvpn-devel] PolarSSL 1.1.0 support?

Hi, On Thu, Jun 07, 2012 at 11:35:58AM +0200, Frank de Brabander wrote: > Maybe this should actually be changed to >= 1.1.2, since there is a > security issue with versions from 0.99-pre4 up to and including PolarSSL > 1.1.1. If the PolarSSL author says so, we should follow :-) > >I noticed

Re: [Openvpn-devel] PolarSSL 1.1.0 support?

>> -Original Message- >> From: Frank de Brabander [mailto:braban...@fox-it.com] >> Sent: donderdag 7 juni 2012 11:36 >> To: Samuli Seppänen; openvpn-devel@lists.sourceforge.net >> Subject: Re: [Openvpn-devel] PolarSSL 1.1.0 support? >> >> Maybe t

Re: [Openvpn-devel] PolarSSL 1.1.0 support?

> -Original Message- > From: Frank de Brabander [mailto:braban...@fox-it.com] > Sent: donderdag 7 juni 2012 11:36 > To: Samuli Seppänen; openvpn-devel@lists.sourceforge.net > Subject: Re: [Openvpn-devel] PolarSSL 1.1.0 support? > > Maybe this should actually be chang

Re: [Openvpn-devel] PolarSSL 1.1.0 support?

Hello, Build system should only care about the interface, not the "quality" of the dependency. So if we are built OK with >=1.1.0 than this should be the boundary. Thanks, Alon. On Thu, Jun 7, 2012 at 12:35 PM, Frank de Brabander wrote: > Maybe this should actually be

Re: [Openvpn-devel] PolarSSL 1.1.0 support?

> -Original Message- > From: Alon Bar-Lev [mailto:alon.bar...@gmail.com] > Sent: donderdag 7 juni 2012 11:33 > To: Samuli Seppänen > Cc: openvpn-devel@lists.sourceforge.net > Subject: Re: [Openvpn-devel] PolarSSL 1.1.0 support? > > On Thu, Jun 7, 2012 at 12:24

Re: [Openvpn-devel] PolarSSL 1.1.0 support?

Maybe this should actually be changed to >= 1.1.2, since there is a security issue with versions from 0.99-pre4 up to and including PolarSSL 1.1.1. On 07-06-12 11:24, "Samuli Seppänen" wrote: >Hi, > >I noticed that my Ubuntu 10.04 and 12.04 buildslaves which had PolarSSL

Re: [Openvpn-devel] PolarSSL 1.1.0 support?

On Thu, Jun 7, 2012 at 12:24 PM, Samuli Seppänen wrote: > Hi, > > I noticed that my Ubuntu 10.04 and 12.04 buildslaves which had PolarSSL > 1.1.0 failed build during the configure phase: > > checking polarssl version... configure: error: invalid polarssl version > > Updating

[Openvpn-devel] PolarSSL 1.1.0 support?

Hi, I noticed that my Ubuntu 10.04 and 12.04 buildslaves which had PolarSSL 1.1.0 failed build during the configure phase: checking polarssl version... configure: error: invalid polarssl version Updating to PolarSSL 1.1.1 or later solves this issue. However, commit 1d92d06dca5ac says "Removed