On Aug 15, 2012, at 05:53:40, Gert Doering wrote:
> Hi,
>
> On Wed, Aug 15, 2012 at 12:00:12PM +0200, Gert Doering wrote:
>> 3 - check for the existance of "--dev tap3" and remember, not cleaning
>> if it existed previously, doing this with RT_NETLINK which should
>> be sufficiently p
Hi,
On Wed, Aug 15, 2012 at 12:00:12PM +0200, Gert Doering wrote:
> 3 - check for the existance of "--dev tap3" and remember, not cleaning
> if it existed previously, doing this with RT_NETLINK which should
> be sufficiently portable across all BSDs. Same advantage as "2",
> h
Hi,
On Tue, Aug 14, 2012 at 09:47:36PM +0200, Gert Doering wrote:
> I can see two options how to solve this:
>
> 1 - set a flag if a device has been opened using a dynamic number
> ("--dev tap", which hunts for the first-free tapN device), and
> if yes, destroy the device on tun_close()
Hi,
background: I spent quite some time in the 2.3 development cycle in
ensuring that OpenVPN quits nicely, leaving nothing behind - specifically,
this meant "make sure that all tun/tap interfaces we have created are
destroyed as well" - which is now breaking some people's setups :-/
On FreeBSD,
