On Wed, 28 Sep 2005, Matthias Andree wrote:
> I have worked quite a bit with Berkeley DB (which SVN set off with as
> its database backend) in bogofilter, and while lots of things are to be
> said about BDB robustness and corruptions, the most important point of
> criticism is that one needs to ta
On Tue, 27 Sep 2005, Charles Duffy wrote:
> I'm not particularly fond of svn -- I think it's not nearly ambitious
> enough[1] and have had DB corruption issues in the past -- but it's
> certainly a big step up from CVS, and history stored in SVN can be far
> less ambiguously retrieved.
I have
On Tue, 27 Sep 2005, Charles Duffy wrote:
> Feel free to ignore the below rant. Revision control is (or at least was
> for quite some time) one of my pet topics, and I occasionally feel
> compelled to bore people at parties (or on mailing lists) with a
> discussion of the subject. I certainly d
Feel free to ignore the below rant. Revision control is (or at least was
for quite some time) one of my pet topics, and I occasionally feel
compelled to bore people at parties (or on mailing lists) with a
discussion of the subject. I certainly don't mean to compell anyone to
switch RCSs a *seco
