Hi,
On Sat, Oct 29, 2016 at 9:27 AM, Jan Just Keijser wrote:
> That apart, NAK to this patch as its not correct
>
> I'll see if I can refactor the patch - but your suggestion to put it at
> the top of add_option did not work for me initially.
Its not about refactoring. The
Hi,
On 28/10/16 19:50, Selva Nair wrote:
Hi,
On Fri, Oct 28, 2016 at 6:27 AM, Jan Just Keijser > wrote:
---
src/openvpn/options.c | 9 -
1 file changed, 8 insertions(+), 1 deletion(-)
As Arne pointed out the utility of
Hi,
On Fri, Oct 28, 2016 at 6:27 AM, Jan Just Keijser wrote:
> ---
> src/openvpn/options.c | 9 -
> 1 file changed, 8 insertions(+), 1 deletion(-)
>
>
As Arne pointed out the utility of allowing setenv opt in push is
questionable. "setenv opt bad-option" in config
Hi Arne,
On 28/10/16 13:08, Arne Schwabe wrote:
> Hm,
>
>
> I would like to see a rationale why this is needed. The client will
> already only warn on unsupported options. Your patch would make push
> "setenv opt unsupported" similar to "push unsupported".
the rationale behind this is based on an
Hm,
I would like to see a rationale why this is needed. The client will
already only warn on unsupported options. Your patch would make push
"setenv opt unsupported" similar to "push unsupported".
Arne
--
The Command