On 28-04-19 11:23, Steffan Karger wrote:
> Together with the pkcs11-helper fixes, I do think this is the right fix.
> I'll try to experiment a bit with it myself too.
Finally got to some testing and staring at code. The patch resolves the
issue for me, and I didn't find any other issues. Our code
Hi David, Hilko,
On 07-03-19 20:14, David Sommerseth wrote:
> On 18/02/2019 16:31, Hilko Bengen wrote:
>> From the pkcs11-helper API documentation about pkcs11h_setForkMode():
>>
>>> This funciton is releavant if PKCS11H_FEATURE_MASK_THREADING is
>>> set. If safe mode is on, the child process can
On 18/02/2019 16:31, Hilko Bengen wrote:
> From the pkcs11-helper API documentation about pkcs11h_setForkMode():
>
>> This funciton is releavant if PKCS11H_FEATURE_MASK_THREADING is
>> set. If safe mode is on, the child process can use the loaded
>> PKCS#11 providers but it cannot use fork(),
