On Fri, 2016-09-30 at 10:11 +0200, Jan Just Keijser wrote:
>
> I'm still grappling for the "killer use case" for this - yes, it would be
> nice to implement support on all platforms for all
> modes, **BUT** I don't think anybody actually uses 'topology p2p' at this
> moment (because Windows cli
Hi David,
On 26/09/16 14:08, David Woodhouse wrote:
> On Mon, 2016-09-26 at 13:34 +0200, Jan Just Keijser wrote:
>> this sounds like a typical use case for "assign a public IP address".
>> This is already possible with topology subnet and some special config
>> stuff on the server side, e.g.
>> -
On Mon, 2016-09-26 at 13:34 +0200, Jan Just Keijser wrote:
>
> this sounds like a typical use case for "assign a public IP address".
> This is already possible with topology subnet and some special config
> stuff on the server side, e.g.
> - give the openvpn server an IP range that overlaps with
Hi David,
On 25/09/16 17:31, David Woodhouse wrote:
> On Sun, 2016-09-25 at 16:40 +0200, Jan Just Keijser wrote:
>> thanks for clarifying - but with OpenVPN 2.4 the default topology mode
>> will be 'subnet topology', in which we also assign a single IP address
>> to each client. Is there a (fundam
On Sun, 2016-09-25 at 16:40 +0200, Jan Just Keijser wrote:
>
> thanks for clarifying - but with OpenVPN 2.4 the default topology mode
> will be 'subnet topology', in which we also assign a single IP address
> to each client. Is there a (fundamental) difference between these two?
Subnet topology
Hi David,
On 24/09/16 01:21, David Woodhouse wrote:
> On Sat, 2016-09-24 at 00:01 +0200, Jan Just Keijser wrote:
>> sorry for asking, but what's the use case for this?
> The use case for point-to-point? It allows you to use a single IP
> address per client instead of having to set aside a whole /3
I may be wrong, but this sounds suspiciously like what we use Gava's client-nat
patch for. To enable us to NAT the device's local IP to the one assigned
dynamically by openvpn (dhcp).
Marvin
Sent from my iPhone
> On Sep 23, 2016, at 4:21 PM, David Woodhouse wrote:
>
>> On Sat, 2016-09-24 at
On Sat, 2016-09-24 at 00:01 +0200, Jan Just Keijser wrote:
>
> sorry for asking, but what's the use case for this?
The use case for point-to-point? It allows you to use a single IP
address per client instead of having to set aside a whole /30 subnet
per client as with the 'net30' mode.
(And in m
Hi David,
On 23/09/16 23:34, David Woodhouse wrote:
> I believe I have P2P working on a Windows (8.1) client (with
> OpenConnect, but I don't see why it can't work for OpenVPN).
>
> I configure the TAP device (with TAP_IOCTL_CONFIG_TUN) with the local
> IP address, and with network and netmask bot
