Am 29.06.15 um 20:22 schrieb Gert Doering:
> Hi,
>
> On Mon, Jun 29, 2015 at 02:46:35PM +0200, Arne Schwabe wrote:
>> }
>>buf_printf (, "%s", line);
>> }
>> + if (!endtagfound)
>> +msg (M_WARN, "WARNING: Endtag %s missing", close_tag);
> Generally speaking, ACK. I wonder
ACK.
Your patch has been applied to the master and release/2.3 branch.
I've added a reference to trac #568 and made it M_FATAL / "ERROR:" for
2.4, while the release/2.3 patch went in "as is".
commit 68eecf76978a80bd5d88e944e4ed5e42bf2fd8e4 (master)
commit
Hi,
On Tue, Jun 30, 2015 at 07:50:16AM +0200, Arne Schwabe wrote:
> > Note that this patch does *not* yield an optimal solution, but it is a
> > simple and rather safe change that will improve connection setup times
> > significantly.
>
> I have no experience with the code and what happens on a
Hi,
On Tue, Jun 30, 2015 at 09:57:27AM +0200, Gert Doering wrote:
> The option is there, the manpage description of the option "fits", we
> just need to make it visible inside ssl.c... :-) - Steffan?
... and while I have the magic wand, another wish .-) - please log a
message what MTU we've
On 30-06-15 14:02, Gert Doering wrote:
... and while I have the magic wand, another wish .-) - please log a
message what MTU we've decided to use. We *will* see "it does not work!"
log files and that might help...
Sure! I just compiled it into your local binary. Just use --verb 4 and
a
Instead of limiting the control channel TCP/UDP packet payload size at
'100 bytes + real control channel overhead' (~140 bytes ethernet payload),
increase the max TCP/UDP payload size to '1250 bytes - calculated overhead'
(~1210 bytes ethernet payload).
Note that this patch does *not* yield an
