ACK, verifying against the polarssl commit.
Your patch has been applied to the release/2.3 branch.
commit f056c8eadc4d5fcda5d1e861425802f503587f16
Author: Steffan Karger
List-Post: openvpn-devel@lists.sourceforge.net
Date: Fri Sep 19 06:43:48 2014 +0200
Fix regression with password protec
ACK, verifying against the polarssl commit.
Your patch has been applied to the master branch.
commit 4b9eaa1ee40648f101deb4ebf07a04cd5b5400e9
Author: Steffan Karger
List-Post: openvpn-devel@lists.sourceforge.net
Date: Fri Sep 19 06:19:13 2014 +0200
Fix regression with password protected p
Your patch has been applied to the master and release/2.3 branches.
Since the second patch basically undoes everything the first one does
and uses a different approach, I've merged them into one patch to make
the net change more explicit - and fixed a bit of spurious whitespace.
Also, I've taken
On 24/10/14 15:20, Gert Doering wrote:
[...snip...]
> ... please don't do whitespace changes in places where no code changes
> (as it makes it harder to see where changes happened)
[...snip...]
> Here's an escaped tab-to-space conversion or so, but "just whitespace
> change" nonetheless.
[...snip.
Hi,
On Fri, Oct 24, 2014 at 02:23:48PM +0300, Lev Stipakov wrote:
> As discussed on IRC meeting, we replace session-id with peer-id.
>
> So, waiting for review and code-ACK :)
A few bits of review on the "non-critical" parts - so, most of it is style,
but nevertheless:
>/* Decrypt packe
Hello,
As discussed on IRC meeting, we replace session-id with peer-id.
So, waiting for review and code-ACK :)
-Lev
2014-10-23 17:07 GMT+03:00 Lev Stipakov :
> Hi Steffan,
>
> Patch attached.
>
> -Lev
>
> 2014-10-23 10:52 GMT+03:00 Steffan Karger :
>> Hi Lev,
>>
>> On 10/21/2014 09:33 AM, Lev S
On 10/24/2014 11:41 AM, Arne Schwabe wrote:
> Am 24.10.14 11:15, schrieb Gert Doering:
> And an important distinction is that the p2p mode does not use Diffie
> Hellman, meaning that it provides no Perferct Forward Security.
No, I think there's another distinction. There's 'static key mode'
(--sec
Am 24.10.14 11:15, schrieb Gert Doering:
> Hi,
>
> On Fri, Oct 24, 2014 at 01:04:17AM -0600, Reinoud Koornstra wrote:
>> I understood the term mode wrong.
>> So the main mode can be p2p or server to denote the openvpn protocol inside
>> tcp or udp(stateless) session. Initially I thought the term mo
Hi,
On Fri, Oct 24, 2014 at 01:04:17AM -0600, Reinoud Koornstra wrote:
> I understood the term mode wrong.
> So the main mode can be p2p or server to denote the openvpn protocol inside
> tcp or udp(stateless) session. Initially I thought the term mode is used to
> denote server, client or udp.
Op
Attempt 2, see below. It seems that somehow my previous mail has disappeared
from the interwebs, I can't find it in the archives.
-Original Message-
From: Steffan Karger [mailto:steffan.kar...@fox-it.com]
Sent: maandag 6 oktober 2014 21:11
To: openvpn-devel@lists.sourceforge.net
Subject:
Ok, Thanks.
I understood the term mode wrong.
So the main mode can be p2p or server to denote the openvpn protocol inside
tcp or udp(stateless) session. Initially I thought the term mode is used to
denote server, client or udp.
Hi,
On Thu, Oct 23, 2014 at 03:42:54PM -0600, Reinoud Koornstra wrote:
Hi,
On Thu, Oct 23, 2014 at 03:42:54PM -0600, Reinoud Koornstra wrote:
> Ok, clear, to TCP cannot be used in point to point mode (p2p) then, because
> in case of tcp we must have a client and a server?
Please READ what I write, so I don't have to repeat it.
TCP imposes an imbalance between the p
12 matches
Mail list logo
