Hi,
On Thu, Aug 27, 2015 at 08:06:27PM +0100, debbie...@gmail.com wrote:
> > On Thu, Aug 27, 2015 at 5:58 AM, Gert Doering wrote:
>
> >> (and I'd totally not run important service stuff on windows).
>
> In the UK, Tesco run their self-service checkouts on Windows.
I'm not Tesco, and I do not p
On Thu, Aug 27, 2015 at 5:58 AM, Gert Doering wrote:
(and I'd totally not run important service stuff on windows).
In the UK, Tesco run their self-service checkouts on Windows.
regarrds
In certain cases we did exactly that. We used a linux appliance optimized
as a router + OpenVPN. But the instances where we could get away with that
is a small percentage of our installed base. Unfortunately the majority of
those sites require the Windows box because of other requisite proprieta
TCP options are not always word-aligned, and accessing a 16bit value
at an odd memory address will cause a "bus error" crash on some
architectures, e.g. Linux/Sparc(64)
Trac #497
Signed-off-by: Gert Doering
---
src/openvpn/mss.c | 17 -
1 file changed, 8 insertions(+), 9 deletio
Hi,
On Thu, Aug 27, 2015 at 09:18:12AM +1200, Jason Haar wrote:
> On 26/08/15 20:35, Arne Schwabe wrote:
> > Okay yes. Active FTP is broken by our simple nat implementation. But I
> > think FTP, let alone active FTP is dead. I am not sure if we should
> > support this in our simple NAT implementat
