Re: [Openvpn-devel] [PATCH] Fix building with LibreSSL 2.5.1 by cleaning a hack. Similar to what is done in curl: https://github.com/curl/curl/blob/028391df5d84d9fae3433afdee9261d565900355/lib/vtls/op

2017-02-14 Thread Steffan Karger
Hi, On 13-02-17 19:38, O2 Graphics wrote: > Use SSL_CTX_get0_privatekey() for OpenSSL >= 1.0.2 > > Signed-off-by: Olivier Wahrenberger > --- > src/openvpn/ssl_openssl.c | 14 +++--- > 1 file changed, 11 insertions(+), 3 deletions(-) > > diff --git

Re: [Openvpn-devel] [PATCH] Fix building with LibreSSL 2.5.1 by cleaning a hack.

2017-02-14 Thread Olivier W
Hey :-) 2017-02-14 21:00 GMT+01:00 Gert Doering : > Funny enough, I was already subscribed to that bug... :) :-) > I find it a bit weird that this not addressed upstream in git itself, > but is burdened on the operating system maintainers... but most likely, > I'm missing

Re: [Openvpn-devel] [PATCH] Fix building with LibreSSL 2.5.1 by cleaning a hack.

2017-02-14 Thread Gert Doering
Hi, On Tue, Feb 14, 2017 at 08:32:42PM +0100, Olivier W wrote: > So, finally I've been able to use "git-send-email" with TLS. The > problem was a patch used by FreeBSD. > > If there are any FreeBSD users on this list or for the curious, you > can find more information on FreeBSD's bugtracker: >

Re: [Openvpn-devel] [PATCH] Fix building with LibreSSL 2.5.1 by cleaning a hack.

2017-02-14 Thread Olivier W
Hello, So, finally I've been able to use "git-send-email" with TLS. The problem was a patch used by FreeBSD. If there are any FreeBSD users on this list or for the curious, you can find more information on FreeBSD's bugtracker: https://bugs.freebsd.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=214335#c10 Or if

[Openvpn-devel] [PATCH] Allow learning iroutes with network made up of all 0s (only if netbits < 8)

2017-02-14 Thread Antonio Quartulli
It is plausible for a user to be willing to add a route for a network made up of all 0s via a VPN client (i.e. 0.0.0.0/1), therefore such iroute should be supported. As of now the option parsing code will accept such iroute, but the learning routine will (silently) reject it after a sanity check.