Hi,
On Mon, 15 Aug 2022 at 12:50, Gert Doering wrote:
> On Mon, Aug 15, 2022 at 12:40:55PM +0200, Timo Rothenpieler wrote:
> > or don't even try to retain capabilities, since
> > they're not needed either way. I'd prefer the later, since fewer
> > capabilities is generally better.
>
> I could
Hi,
On Tue, Aug 16, 2022 at 11:16:50AM +0200, Steffan Karger wrote:
> So I'm really not in favour of retaining CAP_NET_ADMIN "just in case".
> I would even like to be able to not retain it at all.
I hear what you say, and I support that line of thought.
Alas, with current Linux-DCO, we need
Hi,
On Mon, Aug 15, 2022 at 11:54:21AM +0200, Gert Doering wrote:
> [..]
> > commit 2e359a088226ab1e5ee41fbab27d38d8a8d192ac
> > Author: Timo Rothenpieler
> > Date: Sat May 14 12:37:17 2022 +0200
> >
> > platform: Retain CAP_NET_ADMIN when dropping privileges
>
> Unfortunately, it seems
On Donnerstag, 4. März 2021 12:40:18 CEST Arne Schwabe wrote:
> + For a sample script that implement TOTP (RFC 6238) based two-factor
> + authentication, see :code:`sample-scripts/totp.py`.
This filename doesn't match with below.
> diff --git a/sample/sample-scripts/totpauth.py
>
Did a bit of "staring at the code", all looks quite reasonable.
My Ubuntu 18/mingw test rig exploded after commit 2e359a088226a (for
the "make dist" part, it requires libpcap-ng-dev, but apt refuses to
install that...) so I could not compile-test.
Commit message extended with "use
