On 22 February 2017 at 15:47, Christian Hesse wrote:
> Steffan Karger on Tue, 2017/02/21 22:30:
>> ACK. Changes look good and tested against OpenSSL 0.9.8, 1.0.0, 1.0.1
>> and 1.0.2.
>
> You answered to a patch in the middle of a series. Does this ACK apply to
Steffan Karger on Tue, 2017/02/21 22:30:
> ACK. Changes look good and tested against OpenSSL 0.9.8, 1.0.0, 1.0.1
> and 1.0.2.
You answered to a patch in the middle of a series. Does this ACK apply to the
complete series or just this patch?
--
main(a){char*c=/*Schoene
Hi,
On 17-02-17 23:00, log...@free.fr wrote:
> From: Emmanuel Deloget
>
> OpenSSL 1.1 does not allow us to directly access the internal of
> any data type, including X509_STORE_CTX. We have to use the defined
> functions to do so.
>
> Fortunately, these functions have existed
From: Emmanuel Deloget
OpenSSL 1.1 does not allow us to directly access the internal of
any data type, including X509_STORE_CTX. We have to use the defined
functions to do so.
Fortunately, these functions have existed since the dawn of time so
we don't have any compatibility