Hi,
On Fri, May 11, 2012 at 11:52:22PM +0200, Arne Schwabe wrote:
> Am 11.05.12 20:56, schrieb Gert Doering:
> > Changing the build environment to build a shared library out of openvpn
> > is something I do not fully understand yet, though - and don't view
> > a particular useful goal right now.
>> I would like you to try to do so using libtool...
>>
>> Just replace:
>> ---
>> sbin_PROGRAMS = openvpn
>> openvpn_SOURCES =
>> ---
>> with:
>> ---
>> lib_LTLIBRARIES = openvpn.la
>> openvpn_la_SOURCES = ...
>> openvpn_la_LDFLAGS = \
>>-module -shared -avoid-version -no-undefined
>>
Am 11.05.12 20:56, schrieb Gert Doering:
> Changing the build environment to build a shared library out of openvpn
> is something I do not fully understand yet, though - and don't view
> a particular useful goal right now.
The shared library is not used as real shared library. I build
libopenvpn
On Sat, May 12, 2012 at 12:56 AM, Alon Bar-Lev wrote:
> On Sat, May 12, 2012 at 12:52 AM, Arne Schwabe
> wrote:
>> Am 11.05.12 20:56, schrieb Gert Doering:
>>> Changing the build environment to build a shared library out of openvpn
>>> is
On Sat, May 12, 2012 at 12:52 AM, Arne Schwabe wrote:
> Am 11.05.12 20:56, schrieb Gert Doering:
>> Changing the build environment to build a shared library out of openvpn
>> is something I do not fully understand yet, though - and don't view
>> a particular useful goal
Hi,
On Fri, May 11, 2012 at 12:07:40AM +0200, Arne Schwabe wrote:
> * Openvpn for Android is the first platform which does allow non CIDR
> routes (I think). In my port I print a warning in the GUI if I encounter
> something stupid like 10.0.0.0 netmask 255.0.255.0. The same goes the
> netmask of
On Fri, May 11, 2012 at 3:28 PM, Fabian Knittel
wrote:
> Hi Alon,
>
> 2012/5/11 Alon Bar-Lev :
>> On Fri, May 11, 2012 at 12:11 AM, Fabian Knittel
>> wrote:
>>> The main undecided points regarding the interface side of
Hi,
On Thu, May 10, 2012 at 03:42:53PM +0300, Samuli Seppänen wrote:
> Speaking of Windows Phone 7 and iPhone/iPad afaik[1] their
> respective application stores prohibit apps with reciprocal licenses
> (e.g. GPLv2). Is there any way to work around this arbitrary limitations
> without a
Hi,
On Thu, May 10, 2012 at 09:00:05AM +0200, Adriaan de Jong wrote:
> That would be another option. In the model we were using (which might be
> different), the order is as follows:
>
> 1. openvpn is started
> 2. openvpn opens a socket to the remote host
> 2. openvpn establishes the control
Hi Alon,
2012/5/11 Alon Bar-Lev :
> On Fri, May 11, 2012 at 12:11 AM, Fabian Knittel
> wrote:
>> The main undecided points regarding the interface side of things appear to
>> be:
>> * How to pass the fds back and forth: Special-case the
On Fri, May 11, 2012 at 12:11 AM, Fabian Knittel
wrote:
> Hi,
>
> 2012/5/10 David Sommerseth :
>> On 10/05/12 16:50, Alon Bar-Lev wrote:
>>> Why? plugin is adding a custom logic, and you need custom logic. As
>>> I wrote it does not imply
I am listing a few requirements that are not discussed before but may
still be important and non obvious. These at least people not involved
with the Android platform a better picture of required changes.
> To allow OpenVPN to be properly refactored afterwards, the important
> part is probably to
Hi,
2012/5/10 David Sommerseth :
> On 10/05/12 16:50, Alon Bar-Lev wrote:
>> Why? plugin is adding a custom logic, and you need custom logic. As
>> I wrote it does not imply that you implement your JNI there.
>
> Okay ... fine ... there are plenty of big visions for
On Thu, May 10, 2012 at 6:20 PM, Alon Bar-Lev wrote:
> On Thu, May 10, 2012 at 6:17 PM, David Sommerseth
> wrote:
>> Development is all about iterations. Let's see what we can do NOW to
>> get Arne's approach reviewed properly, see if there
On Thu, May 10, 2012 at 6:17 PM, David Sommerseth
wrote:
> Development is all about iterations. Let's see what we can do NOW to
> get Arne's approach reviewed properly, see if there are things which
> can be do to simplify the future somewhat ... but don't make
onderdag 10 mei 2012
>>> 16:33 To: Mendelt Siebenga Cc:
>>> openvpn-devel@lists.sourceforge.net Subject: Re:
>>> [Openvpn-devel] [PATCH] Openvpn for Android 4.0 Changeset
>>>
>>> Hello Mendelt,
>>>
>>> Thank you for taking the time to explain
e.net
>> Subject: Re: [Openvpn-devel] [PATCH] Openvpn for Android 4.0 Changeset
>>
>> Hello Mendelt,
>>
>> Thank you for taking the time to explain the process, now at least I
>> can comment better.
>>
>> On Thu, May 10, 2012 at 5:03 PM, Mendelt Siebenga
> -Original Message-
> From: Alon Bar-Lev [mailto:alon.bar...@gmail.com]
> Sent: donderdag 10 mei 2012 16:33
> To: Mendelt Siebenga
> Cc: openvpn-devel@lists.sourceforge.net
> Subject: Re: [Openvpn-devel] [PATCH] Openvpn for Android 4.0 Changeset
>
> Hello
Hello Mendelt,
Thank you for taking the time to explain the process, now at least I
can comment better.
On Thu, May 10, 2012 at 5:03 PM, Mendelt Siebenga
wrote:
> Android has a lot of limitations on how you can get access to a TUN device
> without rooting your
I generaly agree with Mendelt. A few additions
> We considered two ways of doing this:
> - Modify OpenVPN to make it possible to use JNI to call into OpenVPN
directly from Java code.
I implemented that in the first version of my app (<= 0.4.6). But that
involed evil trickery like
@lists.sourceforge.net
Subject: Re: [Openvpn-devel] [PATCH] Openvpn for Android 4.0 Changeset
-BEGIN PGP SIGNED MESSAGE-
Hash: SHA1
On 10/05/12 09:28, Adriaan de Jong wrote:
> I still prefer using the management interface. It keeps the interface
> to the Java stuff very clean (socket-based). F
On Thu, May 10, 2012 at 12:48 PM, David Sommerseth
wrote:
> -BEGIN PGP SIGNED MESSAGE-
> Hash: SHA1
>
> On 10/05/12 09:28, Adriaan de Jong wrote:
>> I still prefer using the management interface. It keeps the
>> interface to the Java stuff very clean
>
>> -Original Message-
>> From: David Sommerseth [mailto:openvpn.l...@topphemmelig.net]
>> Sent: donderdag 10 mei 2012 11:49
>> To: Alon Bar-Lev
>> Cc: Adriaan de Jong; openvpn-devel@lists.sourceforge.net
>> Subject: Re: [Openvpn-devel] [P
On Thu, May 10, 2012 at 12:06 PM, David Sommerseth
wrote:
> -BEGIN PGP SIGNED MESSAGE-
> Hash: SHA1
>
> On 10/05/12 00:36, Arne Schwabe wrote:
>
>>> I suggest you clone the repository at github, create a branch
>>> and order your changes.
>>
>>
>> that would
c: Arne Schwabe;
>> openvpn-devel@lists.sourceforge.net Subject: Re: [Openvpn-devel]
>> [PATCH] Openvpn for Android 4.0 Changeset
>>
>> Thank you,
>>
>> Yes, I understand.
>>
>> If I narrow this to "feature requests", basically we say that: 1.
>
-BEGIN PGP SIGNED MESSAGE-
Hash: SHA1
On 10/05/12 00:36, Arne Schwabe wrote:
>> I suggest you clone the repository at github, create a branch
>> and order your changes.
>
>
> that would mean to revert all changes, making the changes in small
> steps and commiting each step? (I am still
Hi,
Samuli Seppänen wrote:
Hello,
I have developed the port of openvpn for Android 4.0:
https://play.google.com/store/apps/details?id=de.blinkt.openvpn and
http://code.google.com/p/ics-openvpn/
The API of Android 4.0 requires that openvpn runs as completely
unprivileged process. There all
> Hello,
>
> I have developed the port of openvpn for Android 4.0:
> https://play.google.com/store/apps/details?id=de.blinkt.openvpn and
> http://code.google.com/p/ics-openvpn/
>
> The API of Android 4.0 requires that openvpn runs as completely
> unprivileged process. There all opening of tun,
the simplest
solution.
> -Original Message-
> From: Alon Bar-Lev [mailto:alon.bar...@gmail.com]
> Sent: donderdag 10 mei 2012 9:17
> To: Adriaan de Jong
> Cc: Arne Schwabe; openvpn-devel@lists.sourceforge.net
> Subject: Re: [Openvpn-devel] [PATCH] Openvpn for Android 4.0 Ch
l.com]
>> Sent: donderdag 10 mei 2012 8:49
>> To: Adriaan de Jong
>> Cc: Arne Schwabe; openvpn-devel@lists.sourceforge.net
>> Subject: Re: [Openvpn-devel] [PATCH] Openvpn for Android 4.0 Changeset
>>
>> On Thu, May 10, 2012 at 9:35 AM, Adriaan de Jong <dej.
; openvpn-devel@lists.sourceforge.net
> Subject: Re: [Openvpn-devel] [PATCH] Openvpn for Android 4.0 Changeset
>
> On Thu, May 10, 2012 at 9:35 AM, Adriaan de Jong <dej...@fox-it.com>
> wrote:
> >> -Original Message-
> >> From: Alon Bar-Lev [mailto:alon.bar.
rdag 10 mei 2012 2:10
>>> To: Arne Schwabe
>>> Cc: openvpn-devel@lists.sourceforge.net
>>> Subject: Re: [Openvpn-devel] [PATCH] Openvpn for Android 4.0 Changeset
>>>
>>> On Thu, May 10, 2012 at 3:01 AM, Arne Schwabe <a...@rfc2549.org> wrote:
>&g
t;> Subject: Re: [Openvpn-devel] [PATCH] Openvpn for Android 4.0 Changeset
>>
>> On Thu, May 10, 2012 at 3:01 AM, Arne Schwabe <a...@rfc2549.org> wrote:
>> > Am 10.05.12 01:39, schrieb Alon Bar-Lev:
>> >> On Thu, May 10, 2012 at 2:24 AM, Arne Schwabe <a...
> -Original Message-
> From: Alon Bar-Lev [mailto:alon.bar...@gmail.com]
> Sent: donderdag 10 mei 2012 2:10
> To: Arne Schwabe
> Cc: openvpn-devel@lists.sourceforge.net
> Subject: Re: [Openvpn-devel] [PATCH] Openvpn for Android 4.0 Changeset
>
> On Thu, May 1
On Thu, May 10, 2012 at 3:01 AM, Arne Schwabe wrote:
> Am 10.05.12 01:39, schrieb Alon Bar-Lev:
>> On Thu, May 10, 2012 at 2:24 AM, Arne Schwabe wrote:
I need a better description of the tun process... so far I did not
understand why you cannot use
Am 10.05.12 01:39, schrieb Alon Bar-Lev:
> On Thu, May 10, 2012 at 2:24 AM, Arne Schwabe wrote:
>>> I need a better description of the tun process... so far I did not
>>> understand why you cannot use standard approach of creating persistent
>>> tun with non root access and then
On Thu, May 10, 2012 at 2:24 AM, Arne Schwabe wrote:
>
>> I need a better description of the tun process... so far I did not
>> understand why you cannot use standard approach of creating persistent
>> tun with non root access and then use the iproute2 wrapper with suid
>> or
> I need a better description of the tun process... so far I did not
> understand why you cannot use standard approach of creating persistent
> tun with non root access and then use the iproute2 wrapper with suid
> or sudo to setup its configuration.
>
> Alon.
I have no root access on the
On Thu, May 10, 2012 at 2:09 AM, Arne Schwabe wrote:
> Am 10.05.12 00:50, schrieb Alon Bar-Lev:
>> On Thu, May 10, 2012 at 1:36 AM, Arne Schwabe wrote:
>>> Am 10.05.12 00:09, schrieb Alon Bar-Lev:
Hmmm... the fact that you are not using git, and create
Am 10.05.12 00:50, schrieb Alon Bar-Lev:
> On Thu, May 10, 2012 at 1:36 AM, Arne Schwabe wrote:
>> Am 10.05.12 00:09, schrieb Alon Bar-Lev:
>>> Hmmm... the fact that you are not using git, and create separate
>>> branch for the changes makes it very difficult to peak.
>> Sorry.
On Thu, May 10, 2012 at 1:36 AM, Arne Schwabe wrote:
> Am 10.05.12 00:09, schrieb Alon Bar-Lev:
>> Hmmm... the fact that you are not using git, and create separate
>> branch for the changes makes it very difficult to peak.
> Sorry. I am new to git and the distributed version
Am 10.05.12 00:09, schrieb Alon Bar-Lev:
> Hmmm... the fact that you are not using git, and create separate
> branch for the changes makes it very difficult to peak.
Sorry. I am new to git and the distributed version systems. I hope this
patch is better. I also pushed the changes to
Hmmm... the fact that you are not using git, and create separate
branch for the changes makes it very difficult to peak.
I see a mix of changes and a separate build system which I am not sure
is needed. You build openvpn as a shared library, it is OK, I had this
on my list, but why not use the
Hello,
I have developed the port of openvpn for Android 4.0:
https://play.google.com/store/apps/details?id=de.blinkt.openvpn and
http://code.google.com/p/ics-openvpn/
The API of Android 4.0 requires that openvpn runs as completely
unprivileged process. There all opening of tun, adding of routes,
44 matches
Mail list logo