Btw, is there a particular reason that we don't simply use "broadcast
+" and let `ip` handle it? We won't even need to do the prefix length
check if we aren't setting the broadcast address explicitly.
Regards,
On Sun, 3 Nov 2019 at 19:32, Tom Yan wrote:
>
> Hello Antonio,
>
> With 31-bit IPv4
Hello Antonio,
With 31-bit IPv4 prefix, only two addresses can be provided with the
single host bit. Neither the network address nor the broadcast address
makes sense anymore in such "subnet", as it's basically for
point-to-point link. Assigning such address with a broadcast address
will prevent
Hi Tom,
first of all, thanks a lot for your contribution!
On 03/11/2019 06:30, Tom Yan wrote:
> ---
> src/openvpn/networking_iproute2.c | 6 --
> 1 file changed, 4 insertions(+), 2 deletions(-)
>
> diff --git a/src/openvpn/networking_iproute2.c
> b/src/openvpn/networking_iproute2.c
>
---
src/openvpn/networking_iproute2.c | 6 --
1 file changed, 4 insertions(+), 2 deletions(-)
diff --git a/src/openvpn/networking_iproute2.c
b/src/openvpn/networking_iproute2.c
index 1ddeb5cf..4e2435c1 100644
--- a/src/openvpn/networking_iproute2.c
+++ b/src/openvpn/networking_iproute2.c
@@
