On Fri, Aug 19, 2022 at 12:18:06PM +0200, Gert Doering wrote:
> Hi,
[...]
> It would be cool if uncrustify had a magic flag for that, like "if
> return type + function name is < 40 characters, put on a single line,
> and if over, split" :-)
Pretty sure there is nothing like that. So should we
Hi,
On Fri, Aug 19, 2022 at 11:50:04AM +0200, Arne Schwabe wrote:
> Am 18.08.22 um 22:43 schrieb Antonio Quartulli:
> > yes! This is what we need!
> >
> > Acked-by: Antonio Quartulli
>
> I am out of the loop here. Could you two explain why we need this? I.e.
> what is wrong with the current
Hi,
On 19/08/2022 11:50, Arne Schwabe wrote:
Am 18.08.22 um 22:43 schrieb Antonio Quartulli:
yes! This is what we need!
Acked-by: Antonio Quartulli
I am out of the loop here. Could you two explain why we need this? I.e.
what is wrong with the current style is and what the plan is to
Am 18.08.22 um 22:43 schrieb Antonio Quartulli:
yes! This is what we need!
Acked-by: Antonio Quartulli
I am out of the loop here. Could you two explain why we need this? I.e.
what is wrong with the current style is and what the plan is to change?
If often struggle to properly format
yes! This is what we need!
Acked-by: Antonio Quartulli
--
Antonio Quartulli
___
Openvpn-devel mailing list
Openvpn-devel@lists.sourceforge.net
https://lists.sourceforge.net/lists/listinfo/openvpn-devel
Signed-off-by: Frank Lichtenheld
---
dev-tools/uncrustify.conf | 1 +
1 file changed, 1 insertion(+)
diff --git a/dev-tools/uncrustify.conf b/dev-tools/uncrustify.conf
index 325f3108..c73fba0c 100644
--- a/dev-tools/uncrustify.conf
+++ b/dev-tools/uncrustify.conf
@@ -40,6 +40,7 @@
