Hello,
and sorry for the delay (things like 'real life', you know).
On Sat, Jan 20, 2018 at 3:22 PM, Selva Nair wrote:
> Hi,
>
> On Sat, Jan 20, 2018 at 6:30 AM, Steffan Karger wrote:
> > Hi,
> >
> > On 17-01-18 14:10, Emmanuel Deloget wrote:
> >> Calling EVP_KEY_id() before EVP_PKEY_get0_*()
Hi,
On Sat, Jan 20, 2018 at 6:30 AM, Steffan Karger wrote:
> Hi,
>
> On 17-01-18 14:10, Emmanuel Deloget wrote:
>> Calling EVP_KEY_id() before EVP_PKEY_get0_*() is unnecessary as
>> the same check is also performed in the later.
>>
>> We also make the code a bit better by not calling the various
Hi,
On 17-01-18 14:10, Emmanuel Deloget wrote:
> Calling EVP_KEY_id() before EVP_PKEY_get0_*() is unnecessary as
> the same check is also performed in the later.
>
> We also make the code a bit better by not calling the various
> EVP_PKEY_get0_*() functions twice (this needs a bit or reordering t
Calling EVP_KEY_id() before EVP_PKEY_get0_*() is unnecessary as
the same check is also performed in the later.
We also make the code a bit better by not calling the various
EVP_PKEY_get0_*() functions twice (this needs a bit or reordering to
avoid introducing yet another #ifndef OPENSSL_NO_EC in t