On 12 Oct 2022, at 16:38, Gert Doering wrote:
> people have alreadycomplained at me that I write so long e-mails today,
> so I can write more...
>
> On Wed, Oct 12, 2022 at 08:39:31AM +0200, Gert Doering wrote:
>> Factor 1: single-peer (client or p2p) vs. multi-peer
>>
>> single-peer -> DCO has
Hi Gert,
I’m still travelling today (and am due for my 5G chip update tomorrow), so
it’ll be another day or two before I can look at this in any detail, but at
first glance this looks sane.
Best regards,
Kristof
On 12 Oct 2022, at 15:38, Gert Doering wrote:
> Hi,
>
> people have
Hi,
people have alreadycomplained at me that I write so long e-mails today,
so I can write more...
On Wed, Oct 12, 2022 at 08:39:31AM +0200, Gert Doering wrote:
> Factor 1: single-peer (client or p2p) vs. multi-peer
>
> single-peer -> DCO has only 1 peer, all packets that go into the
>
Hi,
On Tue, Oct 11, 2022 at 09:11:25PM +0200, Gert Doering wrote:
> OTOH, in "not peer2peer mode", we only support topology subnet anyway,
> so maybe it should autoconfigure that, depending on the mode OpenVPN
> requests (p2p mode -> IFF_POINTOPOINT, p2mp mode -> IFF_BROADCAST),
> so we don't
Hi,
On Fri, Oct 07, 2022 at 11:56:52AM +0200, Gert Doering wrote:
> I'll dig into the POINTTOPOINT issue... configure a real MULTIPOINT
> interface for --topology subnet (which is something I've always avoided
> so far, because "we know the other stuff works")
This is... an interesting problem.
Hi Gert,
On 6 Oct 2022, at 16:39, Gert Doering wrote:
> FreeBSD DCO has the open issue of "iroute with the same netmask as
> route, so we want metric/weight/... to differenciate"
>
I’ll try to dig into that, but it’ll be late next week at the earliest.
Best regards,
Kristof
Hi,
On Fri, Oct 07, 2022 at 10:47:08AM +0100, Kristof Provost wrote:
> On 6 Oct 2022, at 16:39, Gert Doering wrote:
> > FreeBSD DCO has the open issue of "iroute with the same netmask as
> > route, so we want metric/weight/... to differenciate"
> I???ll try to dig into that, but it???ll be late
Hi,
FreeBSD DCO has the open issue of "iroute with the same netmask as
route, so we want metric/weight/... to differenciate"
On Mon, Aug 22, 2022 at 02:55:09PM +0200, Kristof Provost wrote:
> But:
>
> $ sudo route add 172.16.2.0/24 10.0.2.1
> add net 172.16.2.0: gateway 10.0.2.1
>
On 22 Aug 2022, at 20:16, Gert Doering wrote:
> On Mon, Aug 22, 2022 at 02:55:09PM +0200, Kristof Provost wrote:
>>> Now, back to FreeBSD.
>>>
>>> - our code does not try to set metrics on FreeBSD
>>> - my reading of route(8) does not show me anything in that direction
>>> (metric,
Hi,
On Mon, Aug 22, 2022 at 02:55:09PM +0200, Kristof Provost wrote:
> > Now, back to FreeBSD.
> >
> > - our code does not try to set metrics on FreeBSD
> > - my reading of route(8) does not show me anything in that direction
> > (metric, preference, administrative distance, ...)
> > -
On 20 Aug 2022, at 16:33, Gert Doering wrote:
- iroute installation works for the easy cases (--route in
server.conf,
--iroute with a more-specific of that in ccd/). It does not work
for the nasty cases (--route and --iroute with same netbits).
I will send a followup e-mail with
Hi,
so, as promised, more details on the route/iroute issues I saw... with
a new Subject: line, to keep the threads halfway orderly.
On Sat, Aug 20, 2022 at 04:01:02PM +0200, Gert Doering wrote:
> - route *deletion* does not work for IPv4 host routes, because of
>"other code stupidity" -
12 matches
Mail list logo
