Hi all,
On 25/05/18 22:56, Simon Rozman wrote:
JJK, I think you are misreading this proposal. No hash is being sent
as a part of the handshake -- its still client and server
certificates that are exchanged and checked during handshake. The hash
is exchanged by a separate channel (say snail
>
> 2. instead of storing a certificate on each side, wouldn't it be nice to
> be able to store the public key only of the certificate, or perhaps even
> a hash of the public key of the certificate?
> To me, storing either the certificate itself is not a problem (I recall
> Jason Donenfeld
