Re: [Openvpn-devel] [RFC PATCH v1 09/15] OpenSSL: don't use direct access to the internal of X509_STORE_CTX

2017-02-22 Thread Steffan Karger
On 22 February 2017 at 15:47, Christian Hesse wrote: > Steffan Karger on Tue, 2017/02/21 22:30: >> ACK. Changes look good and tested against OpenSSL 0.9.8, 1.0.0, 1.0.1 >> and 1.0.2. > > You answered to a patch in the middle of a series. Does this ACK apply to

Re: [Openvpn-devel] [RFC PATCH v1 09/15] OpenSSL: don't use direct access to the internal of X509_STORE_CTX

2017-02-22 Thread Christian Hesse
Steffan Karger on Tue, 2017/02/21 22:30: > ACK. Changes look good and tested against OpenSSL 0.9.8, 1.0.0, 1.0.1 > and 1.0.2. You answered to a patch in the middle of a series. Does this ACK apply to the complete series or just this patch? -- main(a){char*c=/*Schoene

Re: [Openvpn-devel] [RFC PATCH v1 09/15] OpenSSL: don't use direct access to the internal of X509_STORE_CTX

2017-02-21 Thread Steffan Karger
Hi, On 17-02-17 23:00, log...@free.fr wrote: > From: Emmanuel Deloget > > OpenSSL 1.1 does not allow us to directly access the internal of > any data type, including X509_STORE_CTX. We have to use the defined > functions to do so. > > Fortunately, these functions have existed

[Openvpn-devel] [RFC PATCH v1 09/15] OpenSSL: don't use direct access to the internal of X509_STORE_CTX

2017-02-17 Thread logout
From: Emmanuel Deloget OpenSSL 1.1 does not allow us to directly access the internal of any data type, including X509_STORE_CTX. We have to use the defined functions to do so. Fortunately, these functions have existed since the dawn of time so we don't have any compatibility