Hi,
As discussed with Arne in our latest meeting, this patch will be ignored
for now.
Hope was that the xmit_hold filed could be eventually removed, but it
turned out it is actually needed.
For this reason there is no real interest at this point to carry on this
change.
Regards,
--
Antonio
Hi,
On 25/03/2021 22:55, Antonio Quartulli wrote:
> Hi,
>
> On 25/03/2021 22:37, Antonio Quartulli wrote:
>> Anybody can see why we need that for port-share?
>> I'd rather try to understand the above and ditch this member entirely,
>> if the answer is "we don't need it".
>
> After more tests I
Hi,
On 25/03/2021 22:37, Antonio Quartulli wrote:
> Anybody can see why we need that for port-share?
> I'd rather try to understand the above and ditch this member entirely,
> if the answer is "we don't need it".
After more tests I indeed recovered the reason why this is needed with
port-share.
Hi,
On 26/10/2020 10:49, Arne Schwabe wrote:
> Am 24.10.20 um 21:43 schrieb Gert Doering:
>> Hi,
>>
>> On Fri, Oct 23, 2020 at 01:34:28PM +0200, Arne Schwabe wrote:
>>> Make options.c only set xmit_hold when port_share is active to least
>>> document this dependency. I have not actually tested if
Am 24.10.20 um 21:43 schrieb Gert Doering:
> Hi,
>
> On Fri, Oct 23, 2020 at 01:34:28PM +0200, Arne Schwabe wrote:
>> Make options.c only set xmit_hold when port_share is active to least
>> document this dependency. I have not actually tested if this dependency
>> is actually true (or if
Hi,
On Fri, Oct 23, 2020 at 01:34:28PM +0200, Arne Schwabe wrote:
> Make options.c only set xmit_hold when port_share is active to least
> document this dependency. I have not actually tested if this dependency
> is actually true (or if port_share could work without xmit_hold).
I'm not sure I
