Hi,
On Sun, Nov 17, 2013 at 02:31:33AM -0500, Ryan Whelan wrote:
The reason I'd been using tap was because the multicast router (mrd6)
didn't seem to be working with tun. (the clients will be sending multicast
traffic) I'm only slightly familiar with multicast and barely anymore
familiar
Hi,
this is actually not only asking for an ACK, but also for users that
rely on the *old* behaviour (foo.bar.gov - foo-0x12345.bar.gov)
and would be surprised.
gert
On Sun, Nov 17, 2013 at 03:30:20PM +0100, Gert Doering wrote:
Documentation examples, description and code were disagreeing on
Would it be difficult to modify OpenVPN so it allocated a TAP/TUN per
client on connection, so each virtual interface was connected to a single
client? (removing it on client disconnect/drop) This is going to be a
shared environment and the ability to apply security to individual
interfaces via a
What feature does --remote-random-hostname give you that having a
10second TTL on one DNS record wouldn't?
--
Cheers
Jason Haar
Information Security Manager, Trimble Navigation Ltd.
Phone: +1 408 481 8171
PGP Fingerprint: 7A2E 0407 C9A6 CAF6 2B9F 8422 C063 5EBB FE1D 66D1
Hi,
On Sun, Nov 17, 2013 at 03:17:05PM -0500, Ryan Whelan wrote:
Would it be difficult to modify OpenVPN so it allocated a TAP/TUN per
client on connection, so each virtual interface was connected to a single
client? (removing it on client disconnect/drop)
Significantly so. The code
