[OpenWrt-Devel] repeated kernel config questions

2008-11-10 Thread Brian J. Murrell
Using Kamikaze r13161 every time I run a make I get prompted for the following kernel options: Excessive debugging output (IEEE1394_VERBOSEDEBUG) [N/y/?] (NEW) Texas Instruments PCILynx support (IEEE1394_PCILYNX) [N/m/?] (NEW) Enable replacement for physical DMA in SBP2

Re: [OpenWrt-Devel] repeated kernel config questions

2008-11-10 Thread Gregers Petersen
Brian J. Murrell wrote: Using Kamikaze r13161 every time I run a make I get prompted for the following kernel options: Excessive debugging output (IEEE1394_VERBOSEDEBUG) [N/y/?] (NEW) Texas Instruments PCILynx support (IEEE1394_PCILYNX) [N/m/?] (NEW) Enable replacement for

Re: [OpenWrt-Devel] repeated kernel config questions

2008-11-10 Thread Brian J. Murrell
On Mon, 2008-11-10 at 14:03 +0100, Gregers Petersen wrote: Did you try 'make clean' and then a new 'menuconfig' ? I did make clean before I did make oldconfig. Why should I need to make menuconfig? I don't want to use the stupid menu interface. make oldconfig should achieve the same thing,

Re: [OpenWrt-Devel] repeated kernel config questions

2008-11-10 Thread Robert P. J. Day
Quoting Brian J. Murrell [EMAIL PROTECTED]: On Mon, 2008-11-10 at 14:03 +0100, Gregers Petersen wrote: Did you try 'make clean' and then a new 'menuconfig' ? I did make clean before I did make oldconfig. Why should I need to make menuconfig? I don't want to use the stupid menu interface.

Re: [OpenWrt-Devel] repeated kernel config questions

2008-11-10 Thread Stanislav Sinyagin
The makefiles override the kernel config each time you do make menuconfig. It's not a bug, it's so by design :) - Original Message From: Brian J. Murrell [EMAIL PROTECTED] To: OpenWrt Development List openwrt-devel@lists.openwrt.org Sent: Monday, November 10, 2008 2:53:35 PM

Re: [OpenWrt-Devel] repeated kernel config questions

2008-11-10 Thread Robert P. J. Day
Quoting Stanislav Sinyagin [EMAIL PROTECTED]: The makefiles override the kernel config each time you do make menuconfig. It's not a bug, it's so by design :) really? i don't have the build structure in front of me, but the standard kernel config recipe is that, if you have no .config file,

Re: [OpenWrt-Devel] repeated kernel config questions

2008-11-10 Thread Stanislav Sinyagin
this is what I remember from the time I tried to adapt this to my needs. Remembering the values would not be too much of a critical thing, if the kernel parameters would be settable from the user files. There's a place for that in ./files, but this behavior is not implemented. - Original

Re: [OpenWrt-Devel] repeated kernel config questions

2008-11-10 Thread Robert P. J. Day
Quoting bifferos [EMAIL PROTECTED]: I think he means ones like this: https://dev.openwrt.org/browser/trunk/target/linux/generic-2.6/config-2.6.27 I'd really love this to be fixed, because it makes building custom kernels a nuisance. Presumably it's done this way because it makes things

Re: [OpenWrt-Devel] repeated kernel config questions

2008-11-10 Thread Stanislav Sinyagin
actually in my patch http://lists.openwrt.org/pipermail/openwrt-devel/2008-October/003249.html I offered a way to modify kernel config from a board profile-specific file. Same thing can be easily done for user files in ./files - Original Message From: Stanislav Sinyagin [EMAIL

Re: [OpenWrt-Devel] repeated kernel config questions

2008-11-10 Thread bifferos
--- On Mon, 10/11/08, Brian J. Murrell [EMAIL PROTECTED] wrote: From: Brian J. Murrell [EMAIL PROTECTED] Subject: Re: [OpenWrt-Devel] repeated kernel config questions To: OpenWrt Development List openwrt-devel@lists.openwrt.org Date: Monday, 10 November, 2008, 1:53 PM On Mon, 2008-11-10 at

Re: [OpenWrt-Devel] repeated kernel config questions

2008-11-10 Thread bifferos
--- On Mon, 10/11/08, Harald Schiöberg [EMAIL PROTECTED] wrote: From: Harald Schiöberg [EMAIL PROTECTED] Subject: Re: [OpenWrt-Devel] repeated kernel config questions To: OpenWrt Development List openwrt-devel@lists.openwrt.org Date: Monday, 10 November, 2008, 2:52 PM -BEGIN PGP SIGNED

[OpenWrt-Devel] 25c3

2008-11-10 Thread Alexander Morlang
-BEGIN PGP SIGNED MESSAGE- Hash: SHA1 Hi, das übliche Freifunk/wireless/openwrt/etc. konglomerat wird sich auch auf dem kommenden chaos communication congress treffen. Die Raumplanung ist bisher noch nicht abgeschlossen, sobald dies geschehn ist werden wir exakt wissen, wo wir uns

Re: [OpenWrt-Devel] 25c3

2008-11-10 Thread Florian Fainelli
Hallo Alex, Nicht alle OpenWrt developers sprechen Deutsch ;) (my approximate translation below) Le Monday 10 November 2008 18:27:35 Alexander Morlang, vous avez écrit : Hi, das übliche Freifunk/wireless/openwrt/etc. konglomerat wird sich auch auf dem kommenden chaos communication congress

Re: [OpenWrt-Devel] 25c3

2008-11-10 Thread cven
Florian Fainelli wrote: What do you think about getting a meeting (with Palinka and Absinthe) like last year so that we can expose OpenWrt plans for the future and answer questions ? hello, from c-base the best day for a meeting in the c-base mainhall like last year would be Mo

Re: [OpenWrt-Devel] 25c3

2008-11-10 Thread Alexander Morlang
-BEGIN PGP SIGNED MESSAGE- Hash: SHA1 Florian Fainelli schrieb: Hallo Alex, Nicht alle OpenWrt developers sprechen Deutsch ;) (my approximate translation below) thanks for translating, as i am a lazy fart, i would have delayed it until too late. one reason for at least CCing

[OpenWrt-Devel] why no 8.09 RC1 announcement here?

2008-11-10 Thread Brian J. Murrell
I'm wondering why the 8.09 RC1 announcement was not made here. It was made on the forums at http://forum.openwrt.org/viewtopic.php?pid=75990. Do we really have to subject ourselves to the far inferior interface of silly forums in order to be up to date on this stuff? Mailing lists are where the