Using Kamikaze r13161 every time I run a make I get prompted for the
following kernel options:
Excessive debugging output (IEEE1394_VERBOSEDEBUG) [N/y/?] (NEW)
Texas Instruments PCILynx support (IEEE1394_PCILYNX) [N/m/?] (NEW)
Enable replacement for physical DMA in SBP2
Brian J. Murrell wrote:
Using Kamikaze r13161 every time I run a make I get prompted for the
following kernel options:
Excessive debugging output (IEEE1394_VERBOSEDEBUG) [N/y/?] (NEW)
Texas Instruments PCILynx support (IEEE1394_PCILYNX) [N/m/?] (NEW)
Enable replacement for
On Mon, 2008-11-10 at 14:03 +0100, Gregers Petersen wrote:
Did you try 'make clean' and then a new 'menuconfig' ?
I did make clean before I did make oldconfig. Why should I need to make
menuconfig? I don't want to use the stupid menu interface. make
oldconfig should achieve the same thing,
Quoting Brian J. Murrell [EMAIL PROTECTED]:
On Mon, 2008-11-10 at 14:03 +0100, Gregers Petersen wrote:
Did you try 'make clean' and then a new 'menuconfig' ?
I did make clean before I did make oldconfig. Why should I need to make
menuconfig? I don't want to use the stupid menu interface.
The makefiles override the kernel config each time you do make menuconfig.
It's not a bug, it's so by design :)
- Original Message
From: Brian J. Murrell [EMAIL PROTECTED]
To: OpenWrt Development List openwrt-devel@lists.openwrt.org
Sent: Monday, November 10, 2008 2:53:35 PM
Quoting Stanislav Sinyagin [EMAIL PROTECTED]:
The makefiles override the kernel config each time you do make menuconfig.
It's not a bug, it's so by design :)
really? i don't have the build structure in front of me,
but the standard kernel config recipe is that, if you have
no .config file,
this is what I remember from the time I tried to adapt this to my needs.
Remembering the values would not be too much of a critical thing, if
the kernel parameters would be settable from the user files. There's
a place for that in ./files, but this behavior is not implemented.
- Original
Quoting bifferos [EMAIL PROTECTED]:
I think he means ones like this:
https://dev.openwrt.org/browser/trunk/target/linux/generic-2.6/config-2.6.27
I'd really love this to be fixed, because it makes building custom
kernels a nuisance. Presumably it's done this way because it makes
things
actually in my patch
http://lists.openwrt.org/pipermail/openwrt-devel/2008-October/003249.html
I offered a way to modify kernel config from a board profile-specific file.
Same thing can be easily done for user files in ./files
- Original Message
From: Stanislav Sinyagin [EMAIL
--- On Mon, 10/11/08, Brian J. Murrell [EMAIL PROTECTED] wrote:
From: Brian J. Murrell [EMAIL PROTECTED]
Subject: Re: [OpenWrt-Devel] repeated kernel config questions
To: OpenWrt Development List openwrt-devel@lists.openwrt.org
Date: Monday, 10 November, 2008, 1:53 PM
On Mon, 2008-11-10 at
--- On Mon, 10/11/08, Harald Schiöberg [EMAIL PROTECTED] wrote:
From: Harald Schiöberg [EMAIL PROTECTED]
Subject: Re: [OpenWrt-Devel] repeated kernel config questions
To: OpenWrt Development List openwrt-devel@lists.openwrt.org
Date: Monday, 10 November, 2008, 2:52 PM
-BEGIN PGP SIGNED
-BEGIN PGP SIGNED MESSAGE-
Hash: SHA1
Hi,
das übliche Freifunk/wireless/openwrt/etc. konglomerat wird sich auch
auf dem kommenden chaos communication congress treffen.
Die Raumplanung ist bisher noch nicht abgeschlossen, sobald dies
geschehn ist werden wir exakt wissen, wo wir uns
Hallo Alex,
Nicht alle OpenWrt developers sprechen Deutsch ;)
(my approximate translation below)
Le Monday 10 November 2008 18:27:35 Alexander Morlang, vous avez écrit :
Hi,
das übliche Freifunk/wireless/openwrt/etc. konglomerat wird sich auch
auf dem kommenden chaos communication congress
Florian Fainelli wrote:
What do you think about getting a meeting (with Palinka and Absinthe) like
last year so that we can expose OpenWrt plans for the future and answer
questions ?
hello, from c-base
the best day for a meeting in the c-base mainhall like last year would
be Mo
-BEGIN PGP SIGNED MESSAGE-
Hash: SHA1
Florian Fainelli schrieb:
Hallo Alex,
Nicht alle OpenWrt developers sprechen Deutsch ;)
(my approximate translation below)
thanks for translating, as i am a lazy fart, i would have delayed it
until too late.
one reason for at least CCing
I'm wondering why the 8.09 RC1 announcement was not made here. It was
made on the forums at
http://forum.openwrt.org/viewtopic.php?pid=75990. Do we really have to
subject ourselves to the far inferior interface of silly forums in
order to be up to date on this stuff?
Mailing lists are where the
16 matches
Mail list logo