* Brian J. Murrell br...@interlinx.bc.ca [21.01.2009 16:15]:
On Wed, 2009-01-21 at 15:41 +0100, Bastian Bittorf wrote:
KISS!
Heh. KISS would have been leaving the config in the NVRAM as it was
intended. :-)
only very few computersystems have NVRAM - thats why UCI was invented
Maybe
http://www.mail-archive.com/ucl...@uclibc.org/msg02985.html
Signed-off-by: Alexandros C. Couloumbis alex at ozo.com
--- htpdate-1.0.4/htpdate.c.orig2009-01-22 11:20:54.0 +0200
+++ htpdate-1.0.4/htpdate.c 2009-01-22 11:18:55.0 +0200
@@ -359,7 +359,7 @@
/*
greets puchu
Index: feeds/packages/net/shorewall-common/Makefile
===
--- feeds/packages/net/shorewall-common/Makefile(Revision 14144)
+++
On Thu, 2009-01-22 at 09:39 +0100, Bastian Bittorf wrote:
only very few computersystems have NVRAM
s/computersystems/[wireless] routers/ ? OpenWRT is targeted at
[wireless] routers.
thats why UCI was invented
I would have suggested some kind of on disk nvram emulation for such
non-nvram
thats why UCI was invented
I would have suggested some kind of on disk nvram emulation for such
non-nvram capable systems so that the nvram paradigm remains the same
for nvram capable systems and is emulated for others that have, say,
persistent disk.
Why emulate a 1 dimensional limited
http://acassis.wordpress.com/2008/07/01/erro-compilando-kernel-2622-no-opensuse11-gcc-431
Signed-off-by: Alexandros C. Couloumbis alex at ozo.com
--- linux-2.6.23.17/include/linux/time.h.orig 2009-01-22
23:18:04.0 +0200
+++ linux-2.6.23.17/include/linux/time.h2009-01-22
I disagree because that would create an unwanted relationship between
ipkg and sysupgrade and also will result in having old configuration
files if new versions of packages also have updated
configuration files.
Why would you not want such a relationship. [io]pkg's conffiles are
meant to
http://bbs.archlinux.org/viewtopic.php?pid=484856
Signed-off-by: Alexandros C. Couloumbis alex at ozo.com
--- linux-2.6.28.1/fs/yaffs2/yaffs_fs.c.orig2009-01-22 23:47:36.0
+0200
+++ linux-2.6.28.1/fs/yaffs2/yaffs_fs.c 2009-01-22 23:48:20.0 +0200
@@ -711,7 +711,7 @@
chaostables are obsolete for some time now as they have been merged into
xtables-addons
https://dev.openwrt.org/ticket/4431
___
openwrt-devel mailing list
openwrt-devel@lists.openwrt.org
http://lists.openwrt.org/cgi-bin/mailman/listinfo/openwrt-devel
https://dev.openwrt.org/ticket/4432
___
openwrt-devel mailing list
openwrt-devel@lists.openwrt.org
http://lists.openwrt.org/cgi-bin/mailman/listinfo/openwrt-devel
On Thu, Jan 22, 2009 at 06:46:10PM +0100, Steven Barth wrote:
Why emulate a 1 dimensional limited configuration system for all platforms,
with a maximum capacity of 32kiB just because ONLY some old broadcom based
routers use it?
Right.
NVRAM was usually a 32k block of consecutive name=value
Hi,
Brian J. Murrell wrote:
I wonder what the feasibility is of instead of putting a linux kernel in
the kernel portion of the flash image and essentially what's an initrd
in the filesystem portion (because remember, all the / in the flash
image does for me is mount USB storage on /), putting
12 matches
Mail list logo
