Signed-off-by: Jochen Friedrich joc...@scram.de
---
tools/missing-macros/src/m4/fake-gtk-doc-check.m4 |1 +
1 files changed, 1 insertions(+), 0 deletions(-)
diff --git a/tools/missing-macros/src/m4/fake-gtk-doc-check.m4
b/tools/missing-macros/src/m4/fake-gtk-doc-check.m4
index
Signed-off-by: Jochen Friedrich joc...@scram.de
---
package/kernel/modules/other.mk |1 -
1 files changed, 0 insertions(+), 1 deletions(-)
diff --git a/package/kernel/modules/other.mk b/package/kernel/modules/other.mk
index 5398e5e..c1fb1a5 100644
--- a/package/kernel/modules/other.mk
+++
Use offset from struct mtd_part instead of struct mtd_partition for defining
the new partitions. This enables the usage of MTDPART_OFS_APPEND macro in
struct mtd_partition.
Signed-off-by: Jochen Friedrich joc...@scram.de
---
.../generic/patches-2.6.32/065-rootfs_split.patch | 14
On Fri, 28 Jan 2011 17:34:21 -0700
Philip Prindeville philipp_s...@redfish-solutions.com wrote:
There seems to be a dependency between libusb-1.0 and opkg.
libusb-1.0 will only build if opkg has already been built.
Please find the *real* problem not just the symptom if you want your
patches
Hi all,
I wanted to let you know what I'm thinking for block-extroot in general
I am not planning on further work on block-extroot, but rather
addressing the reasons block-extroot was created.
Basically I see a few scenarios where block-extroot, or functionality
requested for block-root applies
I would really like to go - would there be interest in adding an
adhoc-springtime-openwrt-developer meeting.
I visited Guifi.net a few years ago, and it is a wonderful area with
wonderful people.
even user meeting would be cool :) Because a lot of developers will
be there we can organize
Make sure that 'ifname' and other options aren't left behind.
Index: target/linux/x86/geos/base-files/etc/uci-defaults/ppp
===
--- target/linux/x86/geos/base-files/etc/uci-defaults/ppp (revision 25243)
+++
If the network/wan configuration contains solos0 ... solos3 then this list
of strings will be applied to the FPGA when the hardware is hotplug added.
The syntax should be tag=value, as per the values enumerated in the
solos-attr.c list.
In the canned example, the modem is temporarily turned
If the network/wan configuration contains solos0 ... solos3 then this list
of strings will be applied to the FPGA when the hardware is hotplug added.
The syntax should be tag=value, as per the values enumerated in the
solos-attr.c list.
In the canned example, the modem is temporarily turned
If the network/wan configuration contains solos0 ... solos3 then this list
of strings will be applied to the FPGA when the hardware is hotplug added.
The syntax should be tag=value, as per the values enumerated in the
solos-attr.c list.
In the canned example, the modem is temporarily turned
If the network/wan configuration contains solos0 ... solos3 then this list
of strings will be applied to the FPGA when the hardware is hotplug added.
The syntax should be tag=value, as per the values enumerated in the
solos-attr.c list.
In the canned example, the modem is temporarily turned
Backport of upstream patch: always use vpi.vci notation.
Index: target/linux/generic/patches-2.6.37/281-solos_vpi_order.patch
===
--- target/linux/generic/patches-2.6.37/281-solos_vpi_order.patch
(revision 0)
+++
Hello,
I am trying to use a different C library than uClibc for my openwrt
image (brcm47xx target) but I have the following problems:
- selecting glibc will not compile.
- selecting eglibc compiles fine, but bricks my router every time I use
the generated image :(
Unfortunately I don't have a
13 matches
Mail list logo
