On 9/2/11 2:09 PM, Michael Büsch wrote:
On Fri, 2 Sep 2011 00:55:54 +0200
Luka Perkov open...@lukaperkov.net wrote:
Also in linux-2.6.39.4/kernel/Kconfig.preempt you will see for
CONFIG_PREEMPT:
Select this if you are building a kernel for a desktop or
embedded system with
On Sun, 04 Sep 2011 10:11:08 -0700
Philip Prindeville philipp_s...@redfish-solutions.com wrote:
And finally, I'm not really convinced that any of the routers/APs
that OpenWRT supports have latency requirements in the milliseconds range.
I'd rather say throughput matters a _lot_ more than a
On Sun, 4 Sep 2011 01:06:02 +0200
Luka Perkov open...@lukaperkov.net wrote:
What are you actually trying to fix with enabling preemption? I didn't
really get it by reading your mail.
Kernel oops that I described.
Yeah. And that is completely unacceptable.
CONFIG_PREEMPT must be enabled;
On 9/4/11 11:43 AM, Michael Büsch wrote:
On Sun, 04 Sep 2011 10:11:08 -0700
Philip Prindeville philipp_s...@redfish-solutions.com wrote:
And finally, I'm not really convinced that any of the routers/APs
that OpenWRT supports have latency requirements in the milliseconds range.
I'd rather say
On Sun, Sep 04, 2011 at 08:47:46PM +0200, Michael Büsch wrote:
On Sun, 4 Sep 2011 01:06:02 +0200
Luka Perkov open...@lukaperkov.net wrote:
What are you actually trying to fix with enabling preemption? I didn't
really get it by reading your mail.
Kernel oops that I described.
Yeah.
