Forgot to mention, the package is architecture independent.
If the patch needs any further improvements before being accepted please let me
know. And I am happy to maintain this package.
Sent from my iPhone
On 1 Apr 2012, at 14:20, Salander salan...@gmx.us wrote:
Hi all,
This patch adds
Inline...
On 4/2/12 6:06 AM, Tathagata Das wrote:
Hi,
I have modified the patch as John suggested. This patch will only copy a
single file from local repository. If more than one instance of the same file
exists in the subfolders then it will throw an error. I have used latest
trunk
Hi,
On 3 April 2012 07:51, Hanno Schupp hanno.sch...@gmail.com wrote:
Hi, can we get this applied please, before it goes stale?
Thanks
The patch was totally borked by being submitted as html email and/or
by your email client; patchwork didn't even recognise it.
Also there are several code
On 12-04-03 04:52 AM, Dave Taht wrote:
I was wondering why hostapd (on cerowrt 3.3) ate so much cpu, even when
idle, nothing connected, no crypto enabled...
I'm curious as to if this is correct behavior, and what's the point of
writing 000s to /dev/random,
Is it supposed to be feeding the
On 04/02/2012 05:16 PM, Florian Fainelli wrote:
The configure scripts fails complaining it could not find neither glib
2.0 nor libxml-2.0. Can you please start from a fresh build and test
again if that works for you?
Starting from a fresh checkout, I patched the rrdtoo, package and run
Support status led in diag.sh for RB750
Index: target/linux/ar71xx/base-files/etc/diag.sh
===
--- target/linux/ar71xx/base-files/etc/diag.sh (revision 31182)
+++ target/linux/ar71xx/base-files/etc/diag.sh (working copy)
@@ -90,6
Le 03/04/2012 13:21, Brian J. Murrell a écrit :
On 12-04-03 04:52 AM, Dave Taht wrote:
I was wondering why hostapd (on cerowrt 3.3) ate so much cpu, even when
idle, nothing connected, no crypto enabled...
I'm curious as to if this is correct behavior, and what's the point of
writing 000s to
Hi,
Le 02/15/12 06:31, guillermo a écrit :
Patch for fixed point in libfaad2.
Dont know if is the most appropiate way of passing the argument.
Dont know if patch is well done. First time. Work for me though.
Can listen to BBC 3 (AAC) with mpd. CPU usage is good.
Can you rather introduce this
Hi Luka,
Le 03/15/12 02:21, Luka Perkov a écrit :
kirkwood: introduce files folder in order to simplify patches
Signed-off-by: Luka Perkovopen...@lukaperkov.net
---
I would rather we keep them as patches because that makes the upstream
process easier.
--
Florian
Hi,
Le 09/08/11 20:39, Rudolf Meijering a écrit :
Bumped up uhub to version 0.3.2 and added an init script.
Please group the 4 patches in a single one, it seems to me like you
cannot update uhub without requiring all of your patches if you want to
build it.
Thanks!
--
Florian
Great collaboration on these two fantastic routers on the openwrt forum:
https://forum.openwrt.org/viewtopic.php?id=32320
https://forum.openwrt.org/viewtopic.php?id=32320
Above all kudos to aryufan. Well done and thank you everyone else who
contributed.
To-Do: LED for wlan is not yet
On Wed 04 of Apr 2012 06:42:24 Hanno Schupp wrote:
Great collaboration on these two fantastic routers on the openwrt forum:
https://forum.openwrt.org/viewtopic.php?id=32320
https://forum.openwrt.org/viewtopic.php?id=32320
Above all kudos to aryufan. Well done and thank you everyone else who
I sent it with google mail - mangled.
I sent it this time with outlook - mangled.
How is one supposed to send patches to this mailing list without patches
getting mangled? Please advise
Kind Regards
Hanno
On 4/04/2012, at 8:21 AM, Vasilis Tsiligiannis b_tsiligian...@silverton.gr
wrote:
On Wed 04 of Apr 2012 08:30:17 Hanno Schupp wrote:
How is one supposed to send patches to this mailing list without patches
getting mangled? Please advise
Here are some instruction on how to use some email clients for sending patches
to the list.
I hope it helps...
14 matches
Mail list logo
