[OpenWrt-Devel] [PATCH] Allow to build kmod-ssb-gige as module for brcm47xx

2012-11-11 Thread Manuel Munz
Without this patch imagebuilder fails to build images for bcm4705* targets which depend on kmod-ssb-gige because no kmod-package was built. I don't have any hardware to test if it is still properly built into the images, so please review/test. Signed-off-by: Manuel Munz freif...@somakoma.de

Re: [OpenWrt-Devel] [PATCH] Allow to build kmod-ssb-gige as module for brcm47xx

2012-11-11 Thread Daniel Golle
Hi Soma, On 11/11/12 13:33, Manuel Munz wrote: Without this patch imagebuilder fails to build images for bcm4705* targets which depend on kmod-ssb-gige because no kmod-package was built. I don't have any hardware to test if it is still properly built into the images, so please review/test.

Re: [OpenWrt-Devel] [PATCH] Allow to build kmod-ssb-gige as module for brcm47xx

2012-11-11 Thread Hauke Mehrtens
-BEGIN PGP SIGNED MESSAGE- Hash: SHA1 On 11/11/2012 12:33 PM, Manuel Munz wrote: Without this patch imagebuilder fails to build images for bcm4705* targets which depend on kmod-ssb-gige because no kmod-package was built. I don't have any hardware to test if it is still properly built

Re: [OpenWrt-Devel] [PATCHv2] Add support for Huawei E970

2012-11-11 Thread Mathias Adam
ping... Am So, 14.10.2012, 21:13 schrieb Mathias Adam: This patch adds support for Huawei E970 wireless gateway devices. It has been tested on an E970 labelled as T-Mobile web'n'walk Box IV. E960/B970 should work too, from what I know it's basically the same hardware. The device has a

Re: [OpenWrt-Devel] [PATCH] Allow to build kmod-ssb-gige as module for brcm47xx

2012-11-11 Thread Manuel Munz
On 11.11.2012 18:38, Hauke Mehrtens wrote: Just adding some random file to the package to make it generated is not the correct approach. I removed the kmod-ssb-gige package entirely in r34150 and r34151, now the problem should be solved. Hauke Sorry for the bad patch. And yes, images are

Re: [OpenWrt-Devel] [PATCH v3 0/7] [ar7] AudioCodes AC49x sub-target

2012-11-11 Thread Daniel Golle
On 11/11/12 18:12, Florian Fainelli wrote: On Wednesday 17 October 2012 15:46:44 Daniel Golle wrote: Some more cleanup was done: AC49x is now a sub-target (instead of a separate machine) also in the kernel. This further reduces the foot-print of this addition... Daniel Golle (7): [ar7]

[OpenWrt-Devel] [PATCH 1/3] mac80211/rt2x00: support Rt3352 with external PA

2012-11-11 Thread Daniel Golle
Fix a few issues on Rt3352 and make WiFi work e.g. on DIR-615 rev.H1. Based on the work of Сергей Василюгин vasilu...@yandex.ru Signed-off-by: Daniel Golle dgo...@allnet.de create mode 100644 package/mac80211/patches/622-rt2x00-fix-rt3352-ext-pa.patch diff --git

[OpenWrt-Devel] [PATCH 2/3] mac80211/rt2x00: differentiate rf_vals for ht20/ht40

2012-11-11 Thread Daniel Golle
Recent Ralink RFs need different rf_vals depending on whether HT20 or HT40 is being used. Signed-off-by: Daniel Golle dgo...@allnet.de create mode 100644 package/mac80211/patches/623-differentiate-rf_vals.patch diff --git a/package/mac80211/patches/622-rt2x00-fix-rt3352-ext-pa.patch

[OpenWrt-Devel] [PATCH 3/3] mac80211/rt2x00: add rf_vals for Rt3352 in HT20 mode

2012-11-11 Thread Daniel Golle
Signed-off-by: Daniel Golle dgo...@allnet.de create mode 100644 package/mac80211/patches/624-rt2x00-rf_vals-for-rt3352-in-ht20.patch diff --git a/package/mac80211/patches/624-rt2x00-rf_vals-for-rt3352-in-ht20.patch b/package/mac80211/patches/624-rt2x00-rf_vals-for-rt3352-in-ht20.patch new

Re: [OpenWrt-Devel] Multilink PPP in OpenWrt and LuCI

2012-11-11 Thread Nathan Williams
On Fri, 2012-11-09 at 16:00 +0200, George Kashperko wrote: Some time ago I've been building mlpppoe channel (its 4xpppoe over 18Mbps adsl atm working for several months without noticeable problems). Attached are patches I've used to get things working, network config from my ASUS RT-N16 and

Re: [OpenWrt-Devel] [PATCH 2/3] mac80211/rt2x00: differentiate rf_vals for ht20/ht40

2012-11-11 Thread Сергей Василюгин
Hi, Daniel And no, No, NO! :) I pooly explain or you don't pay attention. Xtal20/40MHz external clock/tick generator have no direct relation to HT20/HT40 but precision of channel frequency only. So for that case we use corrected frequency rf_vals table. And Xtal20/40MHz really must be read