On 03/12/12 23:23, Devin Heitmueller wrote:
From: Devin Heitmueller
This patch introduces OpenWRT support for the base Hauppauge/PCTV Broadway
platform. It doesn't deal with the TV tuner or transcoder at this point,
but the core functionality is working (Ethernet, wireless, USB, buttons,
LEDs,
thank you ynezz!!
elvis
2012/12/4 Petr Štetiar
> . Elvis [2012-12-03 10:28:25]:
>
> > Hi all,
> >
> > when i add above
> >
> > 'print("hello")' in /usr/lib/lua/luci/model/uci.lua
>
> You need to define it first at the top of the file:
>
> diff --git a/libs/core/luasrc/model/uci.lu
I believe the key is to give the visitor/user notice... so they know
their searches are being weighted toward a location/retailer and can
decide if that is something worth the free access. I don't think it is
any more 'man in the middle' as Google itself or in violation of any
terms of service prov
. Elvis [2012-12-03 10:28:25]:
> Hi all,
>
> when i add above
>
> 'print("hello")' in /usr/lib/lua/luci/model/uci.lua
You need to define it first at the top of the file:
diff --git a/libs/core/luasrc/model/uci.lua
b/libs/core/luasrc/model/uci.lua
index a394563..f513c77 1
Although the general idea is certainly valid, and even though Open-Mesh.com
is on-board, I would recommend doing to some research about whether Google
itself might find issue with 3rd parties intercepting and modifying users'
search queries sent to google.com. Especially since this has now been
po
You hit the nail on the head. Occasional modification of searches in exchange
for free Internet at hotels.
-Original Message-
From: openwrt-devel [mailto:openwrt-devel-boun...@lists.openwrt.org] On Behalf
Of John Lauro
Sent: Monday, December 03, 2012 4:41 PM
To: OpenWrt Development Li
From: Devin Heitmueller
This patch introduces OpenWRT support for the base Hauppauge/PCTV Broadway
platform. It doesn't deal with the TV tuner or transcoder at this point,
but the core functionality is working (Ethernet, wireless, USB, buttons,
LEDs, etc).
Signed-off-by: Devin Heitmueller
In
That's how I read it too.
You are assuming you would catch it, and know what is causing it... Might be
subtle enough that it just looks like an google ranked ad. (I would probably
not notice, as I tend to always vpn back to home servers and vpn back for even
general internet traffic despite t
On 2012-12-03 7:29 PM, Frank Meerkötter wrote:
> see man asprintf
> [...]
> RETURN VALUE
>When successful, these functions return the number of bytes printed,
> just like sprintf(3).
>If memory allocation wasn't possible, or some other error occurs, these
> functions will return -1,
see man asprintf
[...]
RETURN VALUE
When successful, these functions return the number of bytes printed, just
like sprintf(3).
If memory allocation wasn't possible, or some other error occurs, these
functions will return -1,
and the contents of strp is undefined.
Signed-off-by: Fr
"Paul Fertser" wrote:
> Brian Epstein writes:
> > Assuming Gold’s Gym is now the official Gym sponsor for all Wyndham
> > hotels. Now for example when anyone searches for the word “Gym” or
> > “step class” on Google.com at any Super8 from behind our equipment,
> > the search is modified prior to
Hi,
Brian Epstein writes:
> Assuming Gold’s Gym is now the official Gym sponsor for all Wyndham
> hotels. Now for example when anyone searches for the word “Gym” or
> “step class” on Google.com at any Super8 from behind our equipment,
> the search is modified prior to being sent to Google.com su
On 03/12/12 13:56, Felix Fietkau wrote:
> On 2012-12-03 1:42 PM, Frank Meerkötter wrote:
>> Hi,
>>
>> i noticed that strncpy wasn't used correctly here.
>> Please review/apply.
>>
>> Patch follows:
>>
>> From the man page:
>> [...]
>> The strncpy() function is similar, except that at most n
>
On 2012-12-03 1:21 PM, Frank Meerkötter wrote:
> On 03/12/12 10:43, Felix Fietkau wrote:
>> On 2012-11-22 3:03 PM, Frank Meerkötter wrote:
>>> Hi,
>>>
>>> while building with -D_FORTIFY_SOURCE i noticed a small problem in
>>> how netifd is using asprintf(). To check if an allocation by asprintf()
>
On 2012-12-03 1:42 PM, Frank Meerkötter wrote:
> Hi,
>
> i noticed that strncpy wasn't used correctly here.
> Please review/apply.
>
> Patch follows:
>
> From the man page:
> [...]
> The strncpy() function is similar, except that at most n
> bytes of src are copied. Warning: If there
On Monday 03 December 2012 13:42:23 Frank Meerkötter wrote:
> Hi,
>
> i noticed that strncpy wasn't used correctly here.
> Please review/apply.
>
> Patch follows:
>
> From the man page:
> [...]
> The strncpy() function is similar, except that at most n
> bytes of src are copied. Warni
On 11/22/2012 10:22 AM, Frank Meerkötter wrote:
> Hi,
>
> i had problems building the ltq-dsl-app when switching from
> uclibc to eglibc. This patch is adding a needed include, adds
> a configure test to figure out where clock_gettime() is located
> and runs autoreconfigurer afterwards.
>
> Pleas
Hi,
i noticed that strncpy wasn't used correctly here.
Please review/apply.
Patch follows:
>From the man page:
[...]
The strncpy() function is similar, except that at most n
bytes of src are copied. Warning: If there is no null byte
among the first n bytes of src, the string pl
On 03/12/12 10:43, Felix Fietkau wrote:
> On 2012-11-22 3:03 PM, Frank Meerkötter wrote:
>> Hi,
>>
>> while building with -D_FORTIFY_SOURCE i noticed a small problem in
>> how netifd is using asprintf(). To check if an allocation by asprintf()
>> worked or not the return value must be checked. Chec
On 2012-11-13 11:43 PM, Daniel Dickinson wrote:
> On 10/11/2012 8:35 AM, Felix Fietkau wrote:
>> On 2012-11-09 11:10 PM, Daniel Dickinson wrote:
>>> ---
>>> package/uci/files/lib/config/uci.sh |5 +++--
>>> 1 file changed, 3 insertions(+), 2 deletions(-)
>>>
>>> diff --git a/package/uci/files/
On 2012-11-22 3:03 PM, Frank Meerkötter wrote:
> Hi,
>
> while building with -D_FORTIFY_SOURCE i noticed a small problem in
> how netifd is using asprintf(). To check if an allocation by asprintf()
> worked or not the return value must be checked. Checking the pointer
> argument is undefined.
>
>
21 matches
Mail list logo
