Re: [OpenWrt-Devel] [PATCH] base-files: uci-defaults Actually generate a working ipv6 configuration by default.

2013-09-13 Thread Eric W. Biederman
Jo-Philipp Wich j...@openwrt.org writes: NACK to this patch, comments below. -set network.lan.ip6assign='60' +set network.lan.ip6assign='64' Cosmetical change, not needed. If less than a /60 is available, it will use less. As far as I can tell the logic here is broken. What does it mean

Re: [OpenWrt-Devel] [PATCH] base-files: uci-defaults Actually generate a working ipv6 configuration by default.

2013-09-13 Thread Eric W. Biederman
Steven Barth cy...@openwrt.org writes: NAK. The default configuration works well. The default configuration does not work at all because the @wan syntax does not work. So no the default configuration does not work at ALL. If it does not please try to tell use why. You can set the reqprefix

Re: [OpenWrt-Devel] Developing own packages with CMake

2013-09-13 Thread Yegor Yefremov
On Thu, Sep 12, 2013 at 6:01 PM, Karl Palsson ka...@tweak.net.au wrote: On Thu, Sep 12, 2013 at 05:55:33PM +0200, Yegor Yefremov wrote: Hi, Another useful feature is The source directory override mechanism as described here: http://free-electrons.com/blog/buildroot-2011-11/ Is it planned to

Re: [OpenWrt-Devel] [PATCH] base-files: uci-defaults Actually generate a working ipv6 configuration by default.

2013-09-13 Thread Steven Barth
I'm sorry but the @wan syntax does indeed work. It works for me and many other people using the new IPv6 stack. Could it be that you are using an old version of netifd for some reason? (e.g. you updated / installed only some of the new IPv6 packages on top of the 12.09 release). If there is

[OpenWrt-Devel] [PATCH] [ar71xx] add wireless bgn led support for dir-825-c1

2013-09-13 Thread Sebastian Kemper
Hello list, I checked the GPL code drop from D-Link and tried to get the wireless and LAN switch LEDs to light up. I found some references in AthSDK/www/DIR-825_C1/bsp.h as well as AthSDK/www/DIR-825_C1/rootfs/etc/sysconfig/S2gpio.sh, but in the end I only got the led for 2.4GHz to work. Anyway,

Re: [OpenWrt-Devel] [PATCH] [v2][ar71xx] Add support for Netgear WNR2200 wireless router

2013-09-13 Thread Dirk Neukirchen
On 01.09.2013 20:14, Gabor Juhos wrote: Yes, it is necessary. The coding style of the mach-wnr2200.c file is horrible: Additionally, a board specific patch is missing from 'target/linux/ar71xx/patches-3.10'. Thanks, Gabor I didn't have time earlier but here is v2. checkpatch

[OpenWrt-Devel] [PATCH] [ar71xx] change MAC address behavior of dir-825-c1

2013-09-13 Thread Sebastian Kemper
Hello list, The current behavior is that all interfaces (LAN, WAN and Wifi0) get the first MAC address in the mac mtd assigned (Wifi1 gets the MAC address of the second MAC address plus 1). Unfortunately the MAC address printed on the sticker on the bottom of the router (the second MAC address

[OpenWrt-Devel] ping6: sendto: Operation not permitted

2013-09-13 Thread Alina Friedrichsen
root@OpenWrt:/# ping6 www.google.de PING www.google.de (2a00:1450:4013:c00::5e): 56 data bytes ping6: sendto: Operation not permitted WTF, was soll der Mist und wie schalte ich das aus? ___ openwrt-devel mailing list openwrt-devel@lists.openwrt.org

Re: [OpenWrt-Devel] [PATCH] [ar71xx] change MAC address behavior of dir-825-c1

2013-09-13 Thread Dirk Neukirchen
On 13.09.2013 12:57, Sebastian Kemper wrote: Hello list, The current behavior is that all interfaces (LAN, WAN and Wifi0) get the first MAC address in the mac mtd assigned (Wifi1 gets the MAC address of the second MAC address plus 1). Unfortunately the MAC address printed on the sticker

Re: [OpenWrt-Devel] ping6: sendto: Operation not permitted

2013-09-13 Thread Moritz Warning
-BEGIN PGP SIGNED MESSAGE- Hash: SHA1 On 09/13/2013 01:41 PM, Alina Friedrichsen wrote: root@OpenWrt:/# ping6 www.google.de PING www.google.de (2a00:1450:4013:c00::5e): 56 data bytes ping6: sendto: Operation not permitted WTF, was soll der Mist und wie schalte ich das aus?

Re: [OpenWrt-Devel] ping6: sendto: Operation not permitted

2013-09-13 Thread Alina Friedrichsen
root@OpenWrt:/# ping6 www.google.de PING www.google.de (2a00:1450:4013:c00::5e): 56 data bytes ping6: sendto: Operation not permitted WTF, was soll der Mist und wie schalte ich das aus? I found the bug. Your PPPoE stuff don't set a IPv6 default route. Alina

Re: [OpenWrt-Devel] ping6: sendto: Operation not permitted

2013-09-13 Thread Dirk Neukirchen
On 13.09.2013 13:41, Alina Friedrichsen wrote: root@OpenWrt:/# ping6 www.google.de PING www.google.de (2a00:1450:4013:c00::5e): 56 data bytes ping6: sendto: Operation not permitted WTF, was soll der Mist und wie schalte ich das aus? ___

Re: [OpenWrt-Devel] ping6: sendto: Operation not permitted

2013-09-13 Thread Alina Friedrichsen
https://dev.openwrt.org/ticket/2372 It isn't closed. ___ openwrt-devel mailing list openwrt-devel@lists.openwrt.org https://lists.openwrt.org/cgi-bin/mailman/listinfo/openwrt-devel

Re: [OpenWrt-Devel] ping6: sendto: Operation not permitted

2013-09-13 Thread Alina Friedrichsen
it was fixed in r37402 I use the trunk from yesterday. It isn't fixed. Alina ___ openwrt-devel mailing list openwrt-devel@lists.openwrt.org https://lists.openwrt.org/cgi-bin/mailman/listinfo/openwrt-devel

Re: [OpenWrt-Devel] ping6: sendto: Operation not permitted

2013-09-13 Thread Alina Friedrichsen
P.S.: You need a /etc/rc.local. Writing the stuff in /etc/firewall.user ist quick and dirty. ___ openwrt-devel mailing list openwrt-devel@lists.openwrt.org https://lists.openwrt.org/cgi-bin/mailman/listinfo/openwrt-devel

Re: [OpenWrt-Devel] ping6: sendto: Operation not permitted

2013-09-13 Thread Felix Fietkau
On 2013-09-13 2:02 PM, Alina Friedrichsen wrote: https://dev.openwrt.org/ticket/2372 It isn't closed. Why are you posting a link to a 6 (!) year old closed ticket and claim that it isn't closed? If you're ever interested in sending emails that stand a chance of generating helpful responses

Re: [OpenWrt-Devel] ping6: sendto: Operation not permitted

2013-09-13 Thread Jo-Philipp Wich
WTF, was soll der Mist und wie schalte ich das aus? What about providing some details? X does not work. WTF does not exactly make me want to answer your question. Whats the current configuration? Whats the output if ifstatus wan or whatever name your IPv6 PPPoE enabled ifaces uses. Also note

Re: [OpenWrt-Devel] ping6: sendto: Operation not permitted

2013-09-13 Thread Alina Friedrichsen
This isn't the right place for it: /etc/firewall.user: (while true; do ip -6 route add default dev pppoe-wan; sleep 60; done) /dev/null 21 This is the right place (on Debian) for it: /etc/ppp/ipv6-up.d/defaultroute: ip -6 route add default via $PPP_REMOTE dev $PPP_IFACE

Re: [OpenWrt-Devel] ping6: sendto: Operation not permitted

2013-09-13 Thread Jo-Philipp Wich
/etc/firewall.user: (while true; do ip -6 route add default dev pppoe-wan; sleep 60; done) /dev/null 21 This is the right place (on Debian) for it: /etc/ppp/ipv6-up.d/defaultroute: ip -6 route add default via $PPP_REMOTE dev $PPP_IFACE This is just an ugly hack. The proper way would

Re: [OpenWrt-Devel] ping6: sendto: Operation not permitted

2013-09-13 Thread Steven Barth
http://wiki.openwrt.org/doc/uci/network6#native.ipv6.connection ___ openwrt-devel mailing list openwrt-devel@lists.openwrt.org https://lists.openwrt.org/cgi-bin/mailman/listinfo/openwrt-devel

Re: [OpenWrt-Devel] ping6: sendto: Operation not permitted

2013-09-13 Thread Alina Friedrichsen
Hi Jow! This is just an ugly hack. The proper way would be to rely on and deal with router advertisements sent via the established PPPoE link. My provider (Titan-DSL) do not send any Router Advertisements, DHCPv6 or such stuff. It only negotiate the link-local address and sends it's own IP

Re: [OpenWrt-Devel] SoC NAND driver ar934x/OpenWRT support on WNDR4300

2013-09-13 Thread Gabor Juhos
Hi Stefan, In between I found out that the driver works fine if I erase/write the NAND first using the driver itself. But when I try to flash something using the stock U-Boot bootloader, the driver still complains as outlined in my first message. Right now I have a running kernel and root

Re: [OpenWrt-Devel] [PATCH] ar71xx: add support for TL-MR3040 v2 (correction)

2013-09-13 Thread Gabor Juhos
2013.09.12. 23:17 keltezéssel, Mads Hansen írta: Changed two instances of TL-MR3040 to TL-MR3040-v1 and TL-MR3040-v2, respectively. The kernel uses the 'TL-MR3040' string to identify the board. I bet on that the resulting image won't work with this change. -Gabor

Re: [OpenWrt-Devel] [PATCH] [ar71xx] add wireless bgn led support for dir-825-c1

2013-09-13 Thread Gabor Juhos
2013.09.13. 12:33 keltezéssel, Sebastian Kemper írta: Hello list, I checked the GPL code drop from D-Link and tried to get the wireless and LAN switch LEDs to light up. I found some references in AthSDK/www/DIR-825_C1/bsp.h as well as AthSDK/www/DIR-825_C1/rootfs/etc/sysconfig/S2gpio.sh,

Re: [OpenWrt-Devel] [PATCH] ar71xx: add support for TL-MR3040 v2

2013-09-13 Thread Gabor Juhos
2013.09.12. 15:03 keltezéssel, Mads Hansen írta: This patch adds support for building firmware images for the TP-Link TL-MR3040 v2. Tested and working on v2.1 hardware. Signed-off-by: Mads Hansen d...@taba.se Applied. Thanks, Gabor ___

Re: [OpenWrt-Devel] [PATCH 001/001] [brcm47xx] board detection, GPIO for Linksys E1000 V2.1

2013-09-13 Thread Hauke Mehrtens
On 09/09/2013 07:18 PM, Zachary Catlin wrote: From: Zachary Catlin zcat...@indiana.edu This patch adds board detection for the Linksys E1000 V2.1 router, as well as GPIO support for same. Signed-off-by: Zachary Catlin zcat...@indiana.edu --- NOTE: This is identical to the patch I sent

[OpenWrt-Devel] [PATCH] ser2net: bump to 2.9.1

2013-09-13 Thread Yegor Yefremov
Signed-off-by: Yegor Yefremov yegorsli...@googlemail.com --- net/ser2net/Makefile |4 ++-- 1 files changed, 2 insertions(+), 2 deletions(-) diff --git a/net/ser2net/Makefile b/net/ser2net/Makefile index 2782972..c67e08f 100644 --- a/net/ser2net/Makefile +++ b/net/ser2net/Makefile @@ -8,12