On Sat, 14 Feb 2015 19:55:03 +0100, John Crispin wrote:
ok, i think the spi clock is just really slow
m25p80@0 {
#address-cells = 1;
#size-cells = 1;
compatible = s25fl129p0;
reg
(with r44364 cherry-picked so that openssl builds)
still broken at r44439.
[0.00] Linux version 3.14.32 (openwrt@iris) (gcc version 4.8.3
(OpenWrt/Linaro GCC 4.8-2014.04 r44364) ) #1 Fri Feb 13 21:49:18 PST 2015
[0.00] SoC Type: Ralink RT5350 id:1 rev:3
[0.00]
Hello,
I've added libseccomp into packages. That library allows
programs to easily restrict the system calls they are allowed to use.
In turn that uses the kernel's seccomp filter. That's one of the most
reliable ways to restrict/sandbox processes into specific tasks which
cannot be overriden
On Fri, 13 Feb 2015 19:18:44 +0100
phaidros phaid...@subsignal.org wrote:
if someone could me provide with any of those:
r...@wiki.openwrt.org
hostmas...@wiki.openwrt.org
postmas...@wiki.openwrt.org
ad...@wiki.openwrt.org
webmas...@wiki.openwrt.org
I'd be
On 02/14/2015 04:42 PM, Alessandro Di Federico wrote:
On Fri, 13 Feb 2015 19:18:44 +0100
phaidros phaid...@subsignal.org wrote:
if someone could me provide with any of those:
r...@wiki.openwrt.org
hostmas...@wiki.openwrt.org
postmas...@wiki.openwrt.org
Some Lantiq SoCs are not able to use buffered writes properly with
Intel command set flash due to the way NOR addresses on EBU are
manipulated. This patch disables buffered writes on those devices.
The only device affected at the moment is ARV4510PW, others use
AMD/Fujitsu command set.
The VID header offset must be specified explicitly.
Signed-off-by: Claudio Leite lei...@staticky.com
---
target/linux/mvebu/image/Makefile | 7 ---
1 file changed, 4 insertions(+), 3 deletions(-)
diff --git a/target/linux/mvebu/image/Makefile
b/target/linux/mvebu/image/Makefile
index
On Sat, 2015-02-14 at 14:54 +0100, Etienne Champetier wrote:
Hi Nikos,
Can you send size with/without seccomp option
I compiled openwrt on lantiq (3.18.7) and the size with seccomp filter
is:
1481440 Feb 14 19:12 openwrt-lantiq-xway-WBMR-uImage
3695419 Feb 14 19:12
On Sat, 14 Feb 2015 18:21:41 +0100
phaidros phaid...@subsignal.org wrote:
Nope, I would vote against StartSSL. I know it is free, but the
procedure sucks, and honestly: there is *one* company on the planet
givin out *free* SSL Certs .. if that doesn't ring bells, I dunno what
could :)
They
Signed-off-by: Álvaro Fernández Rojas nolt...@gmail.com
---
target/linux/brcm2708/base-files/etc/diag.sh | 25 +++
.../brcm2708/base-files/etc/uci-defaults/01_leds | 11 +++
target/linux/brcm2708/base-files/lib/brcm2708.sh | 36 ++
Signed-off-by: Álvaro Fernández Rojas nolt...@gmail.com
---
package/base-files/files/lib/functions/uci-defaults.sh | 17 +
1 file changed, 17 insertions(+)
diff --git a/package/base-files/files/lib/functions/uci-defaults.sh
procd gets last console from cmdline, so swapping tty1 (framebuffer) and
ttyAMA0 (uart) is enough to force procd output via uart
Signed-off-by: Álvaro Fernández Rojas nolt...@gmail.com
---
target/linux/brcm2708/base-files/etc/inittab | 1 -
target/linux/brcm2708/image/cmdline.txt | 2 +-
2
ok, i think the spi clock is just really slow
m25p80@0 {
#address-cells = 1;
#size-cells = 1;
compatible = s25fl129p0;
reg = 0 0;
linux,modalias = m25p80,
For targets with NO_XIP ltq_mtd-map[i].phys equals -1 and devm_ioremap fails.
Fix this by using pdev-resource[i].start instead.
Signed-off-by: Matti Laakso malaa...@elisanet.fi
---
target/linux/lantiq/patches-3.14/0160-owrt-lantiq-multiple-flash.patch | 2 +-
1 file changed, 1 insertion(+), 1
On 14 February 2015 at 09:21, phaidros phaid...@subsignal.org wrote:
On 02/14/2015 04:42 PM, Alessandro Di Federico wrote:
On Fri, 13 Feb 2015 19:18:44 +0100
phaidros phaid...@subsignal.org wrote:
if someone could me provide with any of those:
r...@wiki.openwrt.org
I think the business model of StartSSL and others, is that they give
certificates for free, but you have to pay a lot in case you need to
revoke a certificate.
my 2 cents
Saverio
2015-02-14 19:31 GMT+01:00 Alessandro Di Federico ale+o...@clearmind.me:
On Sat, 14 Feb 2015 18:21:41 +0100
Git internals are referenced by .git which isn't necessarily a
directory. It may also be a file that references the actual .git
directory using the gitdir directive.
If .git is assumed to be a directory the build will not be able to get
the correct version when openwrt is included as a git
On 14/02/2015 17:26, Russell Senior wrote:
fixes bug introduced by r44349 which prevents, e.g. AsiaRF AWM002
from booting.
oops my bad, the config files currently used are the ones for 3.18
i will push a different patch that adds the old files in a sec
Signed-off-by: Russell Senior
On Sat, 14 Feb 2015 20:36:19 +0100
Saverio Proto ziopr...@gmail.com wrote:
I think the business model of StartSSL and others, is that they give
certificates for free, but you have to pay a lot in case you need to
revoke a certificate.
Well, 25 bucks [1] is not a crazily high price for a
I think the one for the NanoStation should work as well:
http://downloads.openwrt.org/barrier_breaker/14.07/ar71xx/generic/openwrt-ar71xx-generic-ubnt-nano-m-xw-squashfs-factory.bin
I never tested, but ubnt devices are all similar.
Saverio
2015-02-12 21:27 GMT+01:00 Ken Buska kbu...@gmail.com:
On Saturday, February 14, 2015 08:40:59 PM Saverio Proto wrote:
I think the one for the NanoStation should work as well:
http://downloads.openwrt.org/barrier_breaker/14.07/ar71xx/generic/openwrt-ar
71xx-generic-ubnt-nano-m-xw-squashfs-factory.bin
I never tested, but ubnt devices are all
On Sat, 14 Feb 2015, Nikos Mavrogiannopoulos wrote:
Hello,
I've added libseccomp into packages. That library allows
programs to easily restrict the system calls they are allowed to use.
In turn that uses the kernel's seccomp filter. That's one of the most
reliable ways to restrict/sandbox
On 15/02/2015 00:31, David Lang wrote:
On Sat, 14 Feb 2015, Nikos Mavrogiannopoulos wrote:
Hello, I've added libseccomp into packages. That library allows
programs to easily restrict the system calls they are allowed to
use. In turn that uses the kernel's seccomp filter. That's one of
On Sat, 14 Feb 2015 18:18:56 +0100, Claudio Leite lei...@staticky.com
wrote:
The VID header offset must be specified explicitly.
Signed-off-by: Claudio Leite lei...@staticky.com
Added with some more explanation in the commit log as r44455.
Thanks,
Imre
On Sat, Feb 14, 2015 at 09:23:50PM +0100, Alessandro Di Federico wrote:
I think the business model of StartSSL and others, is that they give
certificates for free, but you have to pay a lot in case you need to
revoke a certificate.
Well, 25 bucks [1] is not a crazily high price for a
Hi guys,
What is the best alternative to TDMA when using OpenWRT and Outdoor /
PtMP access ? Any specific configuration to be done in OpenWRT in order
to deal with multiple clients in different ranges ?
Thanks
Fernando
___
openwrt-devel mailing
26 matches
Mail list logo
