On 15/06/2015 10:50, Holger Levsen wrote:
Hi,
On Montag, 15. Juni 2015, John Crispin wrote:
just for the record here are some of the links that are relevant...
http://anonscm.debian.org/cgit/reproducible/dpkg.git/commit/?h=pu/reproduci
Hi Karl,
On Mon, Jun 15, 2015 at 11:48 AM, Karl Palsson ka...@tweak.net.au wrote:
A lot of this messes up the alphabetical ordering.
Can you point me to exact spots?
I tried to add WeIO support next to Carambola2, as in many cases it is
practically the same. I might be that I did not notice
Hi,
On Montag, 15. Juni 2015, John Crispin wrote:
just for the record here are some of the links that are relevant...
http://anonscm.debian.org/cgit/reproducible/dpkg.git/commit/?h=pu/reproduci
ble_buildsid=3373ffd07e016ae1a81d12cb246fc6787f0bdbe1
Drasko DRASKOVIC drasko.drasko...@gmail.com wrote:
Hi Karl,
On Mon, Jun 15, 2015 at 11:48 AM, Karl Palsson ka...@tweak.net.au
wrote:
A lot of this messes up the alphabetical ordering.
Can you point me to exact spots?
I tried to add WeIO support next to Carambola2, as in many cases
I created my first build from the brand-new CC15.05 chaos_calmer branch. I
patched include/version.mk to get the version right, but no other changes
were needed.
The build is otherwise ok, but opkg does not accept package list signatures
from the 15.05-rc2 directory. When I try opkg update, I
On 7 June 2015 at 15:27, Alexander Couzens lyn...@fe80.eu wrote:
Signed-off-by: Alexander Couzens lyn...@fe80.eu
---
target/linux/ar71xx/image/Makefile | 264
-
1 file changed, 175 insertions(+), 89 deletions(-)
At least UAP-PRO image is broken after
This gets more curious... You are certainly correct that the strings passed to
procd are marshaled correctly. It turns out that the shells I have tried to pass
the numeric-colon-separated list as an option value gets the list split apart as
I noted earlier. Barring any quick solution to this
On Mon, Jun 15, 2015 at 06:15:58PM +0300, Roman Yeryomin wrote:
On 14 June 2015 at 20:15, Roman Yeryomin leroi.li...@gmail.com wrote:
Tested on UAP-PRO
Please discard this, it's broken because of 45954.
I will send rebased version.
Yes, I saw that and manually fixed it to test on
On 15 June 2015 at 15:52, Miklos Szeredi mik...@szeredi.hu wrote:
On Mon, Jun 15, 2015 at 10:24:28AM +0200, Felix Fietkau wrote:
On 2015-06-15 10:20, Miklos Szeredi wrote:
On Thu, Jun 11, 2015 at 2:01 PM, Miklos Szeredi mszer...@suse.cz wrote:
On 7 May 2015 at 15:49, Felix Fietkau
On 14 June 2015 at 20:15, Roman Yeryomin leroi.li...@gmail.com wrote:
Tested on UAP-PRO
Please discard this, it's broken because of 45954.
I will send rebased version.
Regards,
Roman
___
openwrt-devel mailing list
openwrt-devel@lists.openwrt.org
On 16 June 2015 at 01:31, Jonathan Bennett jbscienc...@gmail.com wrote:
Just to clarify, this is only for trunk, not for the CC branch, correct?
Read again: in OpenWrt trunk
___
openwrt-devel mailing list
openwrt-devel@lists.openwrt.org
On Mon, Jun 15, 2015 at 11:37 PM Rafał Miłecki zaj...@gmail.com wrote:
On 16 June 2015 at 01:31, Jonathan Bennett jbscienc...@gmail.com wrote:
Just to clarify, this is only for trunk, not for the CC branch, correct?
Read again: in OpenWrt trunk
Sometimes, even apparently obvious things are
On 15 June 2015 at 19:09, Daniel Golle dan...@makrotopia.org wrote:
On Mon, Jun 15, 2015 at 06:15:58PM +0300, Roman Yeryomin wrote:
On 14 June 2015 at 20:15, Roman Yeryomin leroi.li...@gmail.com wrote:
Tested on UAP-PRO
Please discard this, it's broken because of 45954.
I will send
Hi H01gi,
just for the record here are some of the links that are relevant...
http://anonscm.debian.org/cgit/reproducible/dpkg.git/commit/?h=pu/reproducible_buildsid=3373ffd07e016ae1a81d12cb246fc6787f0bdbe1
Thanks, applied to trunk and CC.
___
openwrt-devel mailing list
openwrt-devel@lists.openwrt.org
https://lists.openwrt.org/cgi-bin/mailman/listinfo/openwrt-devel
Hello,
The first boot, after flashing a new image, runs fine.
I edit my /etc/config/network configuration then reboot and I get
those errors (every reboot):
[8.13] jffs2: jffs2_scan_inode_node(): CRC failed on node at
0x0046000c: Read 0x, calculated 0x4900568b
...
... (many
On 2015-06-15 10:20, Miklos Szeredi wrote:
On Thu, Jun 11, 2015 at 2:01 PM, Miklos Szeredi mszer...@suse.cz wrote:
On 7 May 2015 at 15:49, Felix Fietkau n...@openwrt.org wrote:
On 2015-05-07 08:01, Wojciech Dubowik wrote:
Try to boot with kernel locking enabled. I have seen jffs2 deadlocks on
Hi,
I just committed a change making musl the new default libc in OpenWrt
trunk, replacing uclibc. We've been preparing this for quite a while.
Some packages might still be broken, so please test and open up bug
reports for any issues that you find.
Please remember to open up trac tickets only
I wonder why in https://dev.openwrt.org/changeset/35012 the choice was
made to use the firewall to prevent ULA destination addresses from
trying to be reached on the WAN vs. using routing rules and
unreachable routes. Something like:
unreachable fc00::/7 dev lo metric 1024 error -128
in the
Just to clarify, this is only for trunk, not for the CC branch, correct?
On Mon, Jun 15, 2015 at 6:24 PM Felix Fietkau n...@openwrt.org wrote:
Hi,
I just committed a change making musl the new default libc in OpenWrt
trunk, replacing uclibc. We've been preparing this for quite a while.
Some
* Hendrik hend...@linux-nerds.de [15.06.2015 09:02]:
i just wanted to ask for your oppinions on the second verison of my
patch.
why didnt you pay attention for all the suggestions? bye, bastian
___
openwrt-devel mailing list
OK, Sent the PR in order to remove it.
I already have a update patch that I'll send to list.
However, I guess that perf pkg maintainer (or other) should
be the one to keep the maintenance as I have no current uses
for elfutils and probably I'll not give the love it desires.
---
Luiz Angelo
Hi John,
On Mon, Jun 15, 2015 at 8:56 AM, John Crispin blo...@openwrt.org wrote:
On 14/06/2015 23:56, Drasko DRASKOVIC wrote:
+/**
+ * WEIO Web Of Things Platform
+ *
+ * Copyright (C) 2013 Drasko DRASKOVIC and Uros PETREVSKI
+ *
+ * ## ## ###
+ *
Am 2015-06-15 09:17, schrieb Bastian Bittorf:
* Hendrik hend...@linux-nerds.de [15.06.2015 09:02]:
i just wanted to ask for your oppinions on the second verison of my
patch.
why didnt you pay attention for all the suggestions? bye, bastian
After the discussion on the list this was what I
24 matches
Mail list logo
