On 15/07/2015 19:57, John Crispin wrote:
>
>
> On 15/07/2015 19:41, Matti Laakso wrote:
>>> Hi,
>>>
>>> how is the testing going ? i would like to also pull this intot he CC
>>> which means there is not that much time left.
>>>
>>> also the patch sent was missing proper subject and SoB.
>>>
>>>
To help encourage the growth and strength of OpenWrt, prpl Foundation is
organizing the OpenWrt Summit. Co-located with ELCE in Dublin, Ireland on
October 8, the OpenWrt Summit will be the first community conference
focusing exclusively on OpenWrt. Free for all to attend, OpenWrt Summit
does not re
On Fri, Jul 24, 2015 at 1:00 AM, Aleksander Wałęski wrote:
> Actually, it just dawned on me that they can be doing just that. In
> the bootloader. This is the only part of firmware we are not changing.
> If PCBs turn out to be identical we might want to check this.
That was my first guess, but I a
On Fri, Jul 24, 2015 at 12:55 AM, Aleksander Wałęski wrote:
> so why not
> use some spare GPIO to pull front-end configuration pin to state in
> which it has to be
Actually, it just dawned on me that they can be doing just that. In
the bootloader. This is the only part of firmware we are not cha
> If someone would like to search for differences on the pcb, I can make photos
> of both pcbs.
Please do, it might be interesting. Also, if they are not identical
(except for ADSL annex) it might be very difficult to find relevant
differences.
It sort of does not make sense to me that the only d
Hi Alexander,
On Fri, Jul 24, 2015 at 12:03 AM, Alexander Couzens wrote:
> If someone would like to search for differences on the pcb, I can make photos
> of both pcbs.
soldering rx, tx and gnd on a pcb for a serial connection is as far as
my hardware skills go, but maybe we can figure out the
Hi Martin,
On Thu, Jul 23, 2015 at 11:51 PM, Martin Blumenstingl
wrote:
>> This sounds like an annex incompability? Was I wrong and there is a
>> hardware difference and I cannot use the non B model with annex b?
> Indeed, I have read multiple times that the DSL modem should support
> all annexes
On Thu, 23 Jul 2015 23:51:33 +0200
Martin Blumenstingl wrote:
> Hi Andre,
>
> On Thu, Jul 23, 2015 at 11:32 PM, Andre Heider wrote:
> > The dsl line never syncs, and letting 'vdsl_cpe_control --c' just sit
> > there spits out repeatedly:
> > 'DSL_CPE: Wrong combination of DSL PHY Firmware and h
Hi Andre,
On Thu, Jul 23, 2015 at 11:32 PM, Andre Heider wrote:
> The dsl line never syncs, and letting 'vdsl_cpe_control --c' just sit
> there spits out repeatedly:
> 'DSL_CPE: Wrong combination of DSL PHY Firmware and hybrid type used!
> Please change one of it.'.
At some point during my tests
Hi Martin,
On Sun, Jul 12, 2015 at 3:44 PM, Martin Blumenstingl
wrote:
> Since my latest patches were merged into the OpenWrt repository the
> patch which updates the lantiq DSL drivers/application did not apply
> anymore.
> Here is the updated patch which applies against today's trunk: [0]
>
> R
Hi,
I would like to integrate the upstream devicetree ath79-spi patches into the
ar71xx tree.
But there are some improvements upstream which conflicts to use, they dropped
the spi_controller_data,
which is used by some boards to define the type of chip select. The type is
internal
or gpio. The
Signed-off-by: Sven Eckelmann
---
I got the chance to test the AP147-010 but got no software/SDK or documentation.
Still wanted to post my results because the device worked well enough for me.
I am not sure if it originally comes with a PCIe card (I've used at QCA9880
based one for my tests).
Mos
Signed-off-by: Sven Eckelmann
---
I got the chance to test the AP147-010 but got no software/SDK or documentation.
Still wanted to post my results because the device worked well enough for me.
I am not sure if it originally comes with a PCIe card (I've used at QCA9880
based one for my tests).
Mos
13 matches
Mail list logo
